tiny-scale class
It is debatable whether tiny-scale classes can deliver a host of advantages to teaching language or the effectiveness lies in other factors. In my opinion, I suppose that each factor has its merits based on the ability to organizing a class as well as teaching skills that teachers possess.
On the one hand, there are a plethora of reasons why numerous language teachers should organize small class sizes to produce better results and I agree with that. It is worth mentioning that the nature of teaching language is to familiarize students with languages and a small class size conveys more opportunities for students in order to practice language-related skills. This means that not only teachers can spend their attention and more time on students as well as correcting learners’ errors, but also students have a sense of comfort to ask questions or raise ideas to teachers. Therefore, the interaction thresholds between language teachers and students and the performance of a class are optimized significantly. In fact, nowadays, the language learners who are aware of the benefits of these class sizes intend to apply for a tutoring program to receive one by one instruction.
On the other hand, other elements also determine the quality of teaching language as compared to class size. Supporters for this suppose when looking for prestigious language courses, students extremely concern about flexible skills and expertise of teachers. This is because although the number of students is too high, all of them can have a sense of satisfaction when being taught by a well-qualified teacher with the correct pronunciation. One of the most typical examples can be seen that in universities where the professors of language convey lessons to a host of students. Furthermore, if the lesson can integrate reliable materials with technology devices, such as a projector and speaker, all of the students can be exposed to various practical and vivid lessons with scarcely vague theory.
In conclusion, while small-scale classes seem advantageous to teaching language, other factors also play a vital role contributing to the result of a language class. Moreover, I believe that both students and teachers should have a high awareness of each element to gain the best performance in teaching and perceiving a new language.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-06 | Vo Ngoc An Linh | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 699, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...vices, such as a projector and speaker, all of the students can be exposed to various prac...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, i suppose, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23860589812 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00910601372 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536193029491 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.3040552892 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.571428571 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6428571429 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9285714286 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184025669209 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0753260114406 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973327367054 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145250353877 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975463706404 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.