The graph provides information about the proportion of the people visiting four different Birghton attractions over the course of 30 years, starting from 1980. Overall there was a downward trend in the percentage of tourists who visited Paviilion and Art Gallery, as opposed to the data for Pier and Festival. In addition, the data for Pavilion recorded the highest number in 1995, meanwhile, the art galleries displayed the greatest difference over the period.
In the first year of the period, the percentage for of tourists who visited Pavillion exceeded the data for Art Gallery by 2% at 21% and 24% respectively. The figure for Pavillion then increased significantly to 48% in 1985, making it the most popular attractions in that year, before a dramatic fall to just over 30% at the end of the period. Likewise, the data for Art Gallery witnessed a rapid growth at 38% from 1980 to 1985, followed by a sharp dip of 30% in the last year of the period.
The proportion of people who visited Pier, accounting for 10% of total tourists in 1980, saw some slight fluctuations between 1985 and 2000, before increasing gradually to 21% in 2010. Meanwhile, 30% of people visited Festival in 1980, which experienced a slow oscillation over a 20-year period, starting from 1980. The data remained unchanged at 28% from 2000 to 2010
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90222222222 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75761213577 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3733251411 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.555555556 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138317891087 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683219970088 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461243506934 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104537013856 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380221263841 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.