Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's hectic life human-being overwhelm with abundant tasks and assignments, propelling them to make an arduous effort in order to accomplish them. In this regard, some people approve of this idea that should people have a score of the task to conduct, the quality of doing tasks will be decreased significantly. Others hold the opposite point of view. Personally, I concur with the former group due to a couple of reasons substantiating as follows.
To commence with, the more variety of tasks available to do, the more breaking the concentration while doing tasks. To elucidate this point, The human brain capacity for focusing is confined, and the neural structure capable of processing a limited number of tasks in the given time. In addition, should people harness their brain beyond its capacity, this will be resulted in the drainage of energy and lead to severe mental exhaustion. Taking this into consideration, having a weary mind culminates in working ineffectively with insufficient attention. Under this circumstance, the project is affected adversely, and this issue prevents achieving a desirable outcome in the bargain. Thus, the host of accomplishing tasks and lower performance efficiency is inextricably interconnected.
The second worth-mentioning reason that comes into my mind is that limited time inhibits accomplishing tasks in optimum ways. To delineate, every assignment needs a specific time to be dedicated in order to allow a person to complete it entirely and in one day, there are merely 24 hours available. In this regard, if people intend to do a vast number of tasks, they should allocate more time to carry them out. On the contrary, based on confine time of day, the more tasks to do, the less time could be allocated for each of the assignments. It is obvious there is a direct correlation between the quality of accomplishing tasks and the time people devote to them. As a result, minimizing the allocated time for tasks hinder obtaining optimal results at the end.
To draw a conclusion, I strongly advocate the notion that should people being inundated with a vast number of tasks to do; their efficiency will decrease significantly. This is because not only does the human brain have limited capacity for concentration, but it also has confined time in a day to allocate for accomplishing assignments appropriately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-19 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-19 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | dedsecr | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | dedsecr | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | zmz | 76 | view |
- The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past 76
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- Tpo 43 task1 70
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents jobs 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, thus, while, in addition, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15625 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07645893998 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6025047263 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117564125679 0.236089414692 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422604600862 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480125147025 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084440202667 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00589553027072 0.0645574589148 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.