I disagree with the statement that patience is usually not a good strategy. Rapid action taking is indeed vital under some circumstances, but it also runs the risk of causing loss. I believe that making correct judgement of a situation and rendering wise decisions do need patience.
First, we do need to take quick actions in urgent conditions as ambivalence and hesitation would cause irreversible damage, and thus should be by all means avoided. For example, hospitals usually receive the case where a patient is heavily injured in an accident with multiple organs failing. The chief physician of the hospital needs to analyze the overall body condition of the patient in a quick yet effective manner, and lead the team to begin treatment from the most injured part. Under such situation, any delaying could possibly render some damaged areas untreatable or even cause death.
However, there are still medical symptoms unfathomable to the most knowledgeable and experienced doctors for which they take quick actions they might themselves later found out. This is because given very limited time, they are forced to concentrate on certain parts and thus may inevitably overlook details that might be crucial enough to sway their earlier actions.
While the ability to take quick actions is regarded as an indication of good judgement and decisiveness in an emergency, people also associate it with being rash and impetuous when time is ample. In other words, when the situation is not urgent, action takers are more appreciated if they could carefully examine the information available and actively engage in discussions with great patience before reaching an agreement. For instance, regardless of their political systems, the enactment of a law has never been an easy journey for any countries. The American congress, British parliament, and their counterparts all over the world, which are recognized as the political leaders of the country, have to undergo an arduous legislation process to implement sophisticated laws that can benefit their citizens.
That said, I believe quick action taking is not always a necessity anywhere; action took under impulse can be ineffective or even destructive. People do need patience to measure and make use of the time allowed under a particular circumstance to take correct and effective actions.
- Patience is usually not a good strategy we should take action now rather than later Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- The claims that the burning mirror would have been impractical and technologically impossible are unconvincing First the Greeks did not need to form a single sheet of copper to make a large burning mirror An experiment has shown that dozens of small indiv 80
- The truth is we don t know what the main cause of extinction of Steller s sea cow was There are problems with each of the theories that you read about First the sea cows were massive creatures They were up to nine meters long and could weigh over ten tons 90
- Some teenagers 14 18 take part in various activities such as musical classes sports classes and so on but others only focus on one activity which is important to them Which idea do you support 100
- Patience is usually not a good strategy we should take action now rather than later Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...art. Under such situation, any delaying could possibly render some damaged areas untreatable o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3163538874 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.803287207 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605898123324 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6371724506 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.2 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140373836214 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500436963991 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486371919986 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0831401726436 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318453174172 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 11.7677419355 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.