I disagree with the statement that patience is usually not a good strategy. Rapid actions taking is vital under certain circumstances, but it also runs the risk of causing loss. I believe that making correct judgement of a situation and taking effective actions do need patience.
First, I have to admit that people need to take quick actions in urgent conditions as ambivalence and hesitation would cause irreversible damage, and thus should by all means avoided. For example, hospitals usually receive a case where a patient heavily injured in an accident with multiple organs falling. The chief physician of hospital needs to analyze the overall body conditions in a quick yet effective manner, and lead the team to begin treatment from the most injured parts immediately. Under such situation, any delaying could render some damaged areas untreatable or even cause death.
However, there are still medical symptoms unfathomable even to the most knowledgeable and experienced doctors for which they take quick actions at first. Therefore, they might regret taking quick but not appropriate enough treatment with patience. This is because given very limited time, doctors are forced to concentrate on certain parts and may inevitably overlook details that might be crucial enough to sway their earlier actions.
While the ability to take quick actions is regarded as an indication of good judgement and decisiveness in an emergency, people also associate it with being rash and impetus when time is ample. In other words, when the situation is not urgent, actions takers are more appreciated if they could carefully examine the information available and patiently engage the discussions before reaching an agreement. For instance, regardless of their political systems, the enactment of a low has never been an easy way any countries. The American congress, British parliament, and their counterparts all over the world, which are recognized as the political leaders of the country, have to undergo an arduous legislation process to implement sophisticated laws that can benefit their citizens. And the process does need great patience.
In conclusion, I believe that patience is a good strategy. Quick actions taking is not always a necessity anywhere and actions took under impetus can be ineffective or even destructive. People really need patience to measure and make use of the time under particular circumstance to take correct and efficient actions.
- Patience is usually not a good strategy we should take action now rather than later Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- None of the three theories presented in the reading passage are very convincing First the stone balls as hunting weapons common Neolithic weapons such as arrowheads and had axes generally show signs of wear so we should expect that if the stone balls had 77
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away thus 78
- Some people say that we should always follow our dreams even if the dreams are very ambitious Others think that we should focus on achieving realistic goals 75
- Patience is usually not a good strategy we should take action now rather than later Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 320, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to take correct and efficient actions.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, really, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.0752688172 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2086.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39018087855 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83449223434 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571059431525 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1339062608 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.888888889 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141085256022 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510973707239 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465424977193 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944603464048 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572542797651 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.