The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The diagram illustrates the increase and decrease of giving money to donate by English peoples. The bar chart includes for the years 1990 and 2010.

The lowest figure on the chart is for between the ages of 18 and 25. Because peoples of this age are young and unemployed segment of the population. In the 1990's years the charity was better than 2010's years in this age.

This percentage on the chart shows that the people who at the age of between 26-35 quite better than the youngest peoples. But the rating difference between 1990 and 2010 years is similar theirs.

The hingest percentage belongs the peoples of between the age 36 and 50. Becuse most of them have jobs. The percentage was better in 1990's years. In 2010's years the percentage decreased to 5%.

Between the age of 51-65 and older than 65 are old peoples segment of the population. Most of them are pensioner. Their charity rating is also better. In the 2010's years their percentage has changed better.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ncludes for the years 1990 and 2010. The lowest figure on the chart is for betwe...
^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...em have jobs. The percentage was better in 1990s years. In 2010s years the percentage de...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 147, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'In the 2010s'.
Suggestion: In the 2010s
...e percentage was better in 1990s years. In 2010s years the percentage decreased to 5%. ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73684210526 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31097023507 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485380116959 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2841628078 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 54.0 112.824112599 48% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.4 22.9334400587 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.13333333333 5.23603664747 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243217698062 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864401713309 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541072914227 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150497010686 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464649098992 0.0819641961636 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.6 13.2329268293 50% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.69 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.03 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.77 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.