The diagram shows the relationship among a number of different languages.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features.
The diagram displays both the similarity and connection between a variety of languages. For the reason of clear explanation, it is provided with examples.
Overall, five different types of languages (logographic, Abjad, Abjuda, Alphabetic, and Syllabic) compared each other by their writing structures. Whilst, there was a dissimilar style in each system, it is observed that there was a common usage of the consonant in Abjad, Abjuda, and alphabetic. Despite the usage of consonants, the common usage undetected in logographic and Syllabic style.
Furthermore, it is making the Logographic system odd because the mere word expresses character. For instance, both Chinese and Japanese using the same system in the speaking language. Another diverse system is Syllabic, which also consists of the only syllable. A familiar example is the Japanese Kana that is consists of one syllable.
Thereupon, Abjuda considered a common writing system by its usage of the consonant. Nevertheless, the diagram highlighting the language distinguished by character constitution number compared to other languages that have only one constitution. A specific example is the Indian word Devanagari that is created by one consonant and one vowel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-08-18 | Zahid6400 | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-07 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-09 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | maidiem.1508 | 73 | view |
- Discussion about online encyclopedia and traditional encyclopedia's advantages and disadvantages 78
- The diagram shows relationships amone a number of different types of languagess 11
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing games teaches us about life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- liner graph 11
- In today s competitive world many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income others feel they lack suppor because of their parents absence 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62352941176 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05778262832 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5832888128 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9090909091 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4545454545 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0520190296412 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0184583103927 0.103423049105 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306761576798 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0334194476833 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213896823847 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.