some people say that language courses using the internet and allowing you to talk to somebody is a good way to learn language skills. others however believe that study in classroom is still the best way of learning. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
The trend of learning different languages is gaining prevalence in this modern world. Presently, majority of masses assert that internet play a vital role to provide distinct language as well as it gives chance to communicate with national tutor. By contrast, rest of the individuals ponder that classroom could be lucrative to learner linguistic skills. Here, I would like to account for both the views along with my own perception.
There are many food points to support former view. To embark with, internet provide access to language website and language apps to demonstrate competition amount to applications which provide linguistic skills such as cambly, Duolingo, Google translate and so on as well as masses can learn distinct skills of language such as speaking, reading, writing and listening. Besides this, internet allows people to explore the concepts of languages such as spelling, vocabulary, grammar rules with few clicks. Apart from this, individuals can gain worthwhile tips and strategies shared by experts to enhance their proficiency. Thus, internet plays a phenomenal role in improving language skills. Moreover, people can easily talk with online tutors by internet. Hence, internet could be lucrative two masses who can communicate with foreigner to improve their language skills. On the flip side, other have conflicting views.
Numerous points can be put down to shore up the later view. Initially, studying in classroom allows student to get healthy and disciplined environment. To demonstrate, learning languages with a group of students is quite good for them and it would be beneficial to take part in different activities such as group discussion, debate, role play and so on. Apart from it, teachers not only provide instructions but also maintain discipline in classes. On the other hand, taking classes from internet neither learn with group members nor learn with discipline. Thence, classroom helps adolescents to learn a language. Moving further, juveniles can do face-to-face conversation with classmates and tutors more effectively whereas online communication is less interesting and impactful. As a result, attending classroom is the best choice to improve linguistic skills.
To recapitulate, undeniably, the benefits of internet could not be underestimated. However, I still believe that learning from teacher could be lucrative for students as they can easily get knowledge about new language from basic concepts as well as it allows to people show their ideas to others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-26 | Harshkaur | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-21 | nehasingla.ns | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of cotton t shirt 100
- Some people think that government should spend texspares fund on cultural activities such as music and art Others think this is a waste of money Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- It is important for school children to learn about their local history than the world history Do you agree or disagree give your opinion and example 56
- More and more people are leaving the country side and moving to cities Do the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages 74
- Many people had been involved in sports as children but do not do any physical exercise as adults What are the reasons for people avoide physical exercise How to overcome this trend and motivate to be more physically active 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ake part in different activities such as group discussion, debate, role play and...
^^
Line 5, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities such as group discussion, debate, role play and so on. Apart from it, teac...
^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'peopling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: peopling
...rom basic concepts as well as it allows to people show their ideas to others.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, thus, well, whereas, while, apart from, as to, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2137.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49357326478 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90319809102 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560411311054 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.8247212397 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1363636364 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6818181818 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247447154235 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716050851367 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465723743984 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15750353836 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227688363692 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.