1. The graphs below show the opening and closure and the types of magazines that opened in Southern Europe between 1995-2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs illustrate Southern Europe’s opening and closing of magazines and their type by covering the period from 1995 to 2015. The first and second graphs have displayed as bar charts and pie charts relatively.
Overall, the opening was relatively higher in the first decade (1995 to 2005) and close quantity increased striking from 2010 to 2015. During two decades, it is observed that entertainment&TV (35%) and Music magazines (30%) and, Hobbies (21%) were the most popular types of magazines that opened.
Furthermore, opening quantity has reached in 2005 by almost 400 and at the same time closing was less than 50, however, opening speed decreased at the end of period (2015) to less than 200 and closing rate peaked by more than 350. Additionally, it was 2000, the opening quantity reached its highest point between 1995 to 2015.
Moreover, pie chart giving the information that it was Business, Finance, Politics and other (9% and 5% relatively) types of magazines were least interested, on the other hand, Entertainment and TV-related magazines (35%)were the most interesting type in Southern Europe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-27 | tamir052222 | 89 | view |
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do 70
- In today s competitive world many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income others feel they lack suppor because of their parents absence 56
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People behave differently when they aren t in health Do you agree that health status influence the way people behave Use specific examples to support your answer 87
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation Summerise information by selecting and reporting the main feature 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17877094972 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7327745155 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586592178771 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9703525965 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252473394743 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128823699329 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896473569432 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155391661359 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506536387021 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.