Government should make laws about people’s nutrition and food choice. Other argue that is their choice.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Having a nutritious meal is advisable to every individual, and to some people, governments should come up with laws to restrict certain food consumption. To many people, however, believe that it is up to them to decide what to eat. From my perspective, I opine that we should be let free in choosing our food.
To advocates, by imposing strict laws to food that are considered unhealthy or poisonous, everyone is obligated to consider what to be in their groceries list carefully, ending up choosing nutritious products. Food manufactures also have to double-check on their nutrient contents before their products reach the consumers. Not only do governments’ restrictions on food choices ensure that everyone consume healthy, but it is also a solution to eradicate food that are made from endangered species, or those that are made from pets. There are a number of countries, mostly Asians’ include animals that are in the red list like blue whale or blue fin tune, or cats and dogs in their dietary consumption. Such regulations plays a part in halting these ways of eating, which apparently save those creatures.
On the other hand, critics argue that the governments cannot take advantage of the authority to force people to eat the way they want. Firstly, not everyone shares the same definition of healthiness, nor do they have the same level of nutrition intake as it depends on their current lifestyle and conditions. In other words, certain food may be good for some but bad for others. Besides, by imposing such an unfair law on food, people’s opportunities to have a taste on new and strange food vanished, leaving people feeling dissatisfied. This may lead to problems such as illegal importing of banned dietary products.
To sum up, even though laws contribute to molding the way people eat to a somehow positive way, it doesn’t mean people’s health and satisfaction is assured when abiding by. Hence, letting people choose their food is the solution that ensures both.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-05 | The Lazy Tiger | 92 | view |
| 2020-12-17 | nuvuong98 | 73 | view |
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of household in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whateverthey like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 721, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'play'.
Suggestion: play
...r dietary consumption. Such regulations plays a part in halting these ways of eating,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, such as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06344410876 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84064398006 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592145015106 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9168909705 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.733333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248968707001 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074188398246 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519084050217 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140097817274 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223476533058 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.