In the hectic life of today, it is significant for youngsters have different kinds of skills. When it comes to this issue, some people believe that young members of society have to be able to make plans for themselves, while some others thinks that it is not an important matter for youngster since they have enough time to think about those things as they are young. As far as I am concerned, I suppose the first idea carries more weight due to some reasons. I will enlarge on what I mean in the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, there are a number of factors these days due to complicated modern life, which can thoroughly affect young people's lives that is why it is a must for them to have the ability to organize their lives. To be more exact, the unprecedented burgeoning of technology makes distinctive aspects of young people's lives so noteworthy. If youngsters neglect those aspects of not having any program, they will lose lots of precious things like time and opportunities. As we know, time is gold, so we have to make the biggest advantage from it. For the best use of time, we have to make a bunch of precise plans without which we lose the time while we achieve nothing. I have to admit that my own experience, is a compelling example of that. I should have studied more when I was in university in case my university's knowledge help me in this complex world. Whereas, I did not have any plan for that, accordingly I lost my time and did nothing. As a result, young people have to have the skill to make plans for their lives in the modern life to use it better than ever.
The other reason which deserves some words here lies in the fact that complexity can confuse everybody, so having the ability to scheme is really essential for people, especially for youngster who get nervous very soon since they do not have enough experience. To clarify this point, people often will be angry, if they do not know what they should do which is a popular happening nowadays because of the complicated life. This subject is more noticeable among young members of each community since they have lots of energy and no experience where they should spend it. As a result, it is so significant for young people to be able to make plans for their lives.
To sum up, given the facts that several factors affect youngsters' lives in this complex world and they will get nervous, if they do not have any scheme, I vehemently believe that having the skill to organize is very noteworthy for youngsters.
- Do you give money to charitable organizations do you prefer to choose how the donation will be used donate money on food or service or leave the decision to the organization 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying Use specific reasons and examples to support you answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Should a city try to preserve its old historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 70
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, really, so, whereas, while, i mean, i suppose, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56319290466 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51100791349 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465631929047 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.9961299893 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0555555556 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280506866819 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954262544558 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650547963846 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177353969944 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040195269479 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, really, so, whereas, while, i mean, i suppose, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56319290466 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51100791349 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465631929047 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 659.7 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.9961299893 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0555555556 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280506866819 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954262544558 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650547963846 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177353969944 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040195269479 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.