This bar chart illustrates various types of energy produced by France during the year 1995 and 2005.
Overall, France has produced various types of energy's: Gas, coal, Nuclear, Petrol and others. Moreover, during the year of 1995 and 2005 more changes has taken place in the production of energy's in the France.
Firstly, during the year of 1995, 29.63% of gas was produced by France which was their major production. coal with 29.80% occupy its second position during this year. Thereafter, petrol with 29.27% took its third position, nuclear and all other energy's has only 6.40% and 4.90% which has lowest production units in France.
Secondly, looking into 2005 France has increased their production of Gas up to 30.31% which is higher than 1995. Coal production was increased by the country by 30.93% which is 1.13% more than 1995. France focused less over Petroleum production by 19.55% where in 1995 it was 29.27%. Nuclear production was increased by 4.1% than 1995 and in 2005 it is 10.10%. All other energy production units have increased by 5.1% which is 9.10% in the year 2005.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...95, 29.63% of gas was produced by France which was their major production. coal w...
^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Coal
...ance which was their major production. coal with 29.80% occupy its second position ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'has the lowest'.
Suggestion: has the lowest
... energys has only 6.40% and 4.90% which has lowest production units in France. Secondly, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed their production of Gas up to 30.31% which is higher than 1995. Coal producti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, look, moreover, second, secondly, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96174863388 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30000772478 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502732240437 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6251721757 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.5454545455 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18440185329 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892843062027 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048622763217 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140846338427 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328997738826 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.