In this modern contemporary era, where technology has played a crucial role in the development of methods where people can easily communicate, commute and get information at their door-steps. It is observed that the interaction among family members has been drastically reduced compared to the olden days. In my opinion, the above statement is true and I shall explain why in the following essay.
Nowadays, Electronic devices have been made very easily accessible by technology. Because of this, families have started utilizing their leisure time on social media which has reduced the verbal communication among them which was not the case in the past. This has led to a change in human behaviour across all age groups where people like spending time by themselves and thus results in less bonding, lack of affection and love. For example, a teenager would like to spend time playing games on his mobile phone rather than talking to his parents.
Furthermore, there is a major improvement in the education sector these days which has led to people to study more, think broad and to move to the urban cities for better job opportunities whereas in the olden days the entire family members used to follow the traditional occupation helping each other out. Although this has made people more materialistic, independent and financially stable, it also has resulted in a huge gap in communication among families due to hectic lifestyle in order to improve the standard of living. For instance, A farmers son who migrated to the city to work in a Multinational Company is unable to communicate with his family because of overtime shifts and also not able travel back to his hometown due to lack of leaves.
In conclusion, I vehemently advocate the statement that communication in the houses has been falling. Neither, Members are not expressing their feelings at home nor to the family members. While they are finding joy and enthusiasm in mobiles or laptops, an enhanced lifestyle is having detrimental effects on the younger generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'farmers'' or 'farmer's'?
Suggestion: farmers'; farmer's
...the standard of living. For instance, A farmers son who migrated to the city to work in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10447761194 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85243210292 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605970149254 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7624699559 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.538461538 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7692307692 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143318617303 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459823814085 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031479567015 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794403801394 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175415973184 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.