It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents job | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.

In today’s progress and competitive world, choosing an appropriate job can make people successful in the near future. In this vein, the issue of vocation has always been a preoccupation for people. Some people are proponents of the claim that following the jobs that parents and ancestors used to engage in is a better choice for children in their future; however, others stand at the opposite side of the continuum. Personally speaking, I concur with the latter group believing that children should choose occupations that are very different from their parents’ professions. My viewpoint is based on a few reasons, to compelling ones of which are elaborated upon hereunder.

The first vital point to bear in mind is that children should choose jobs in which they are interested, meaning that it is not necessary that children pursue the jobs of their parents and ancestors. It is no secret to anyone that when individuals occupy their favourite jobs, they follow them more incentive. Under this situation, motivation resulted from engaging in a favourite job can provide people with an opportunity to become a successful person, which can help them to have a prospering life in the near future. As a result, the more children are interested in their job, the more motivated they will be to become successful people. My close friend can be an explicit example of what I mean. As his parents are both chemists, they wanted their only child to follow their job and become a professor in this field. However, my friend had difficulty understanding even the simplest concepts and formulas of this field. However, his parents were insistent to convince him to choose this field when he would attend university. After years, although he is a professor in the chemistry field, he has an arduous life since it is not what he was interested in.

Secondly, following the same jobs of parents can dry out the inner talent spring and also make children a close-minded person in the future. It is obviously true that every person everywhere in the world has a specific talent and ability, which how making a decision can play a vital role in flourishing or smothering them in the future. When children blindly pursue their parents’ jobs, they will never unmask their talent and will never find out what they are really good at, or at least will sense it late. My own experience can be a compelling example of this. I’m a high-school teacher, a conventional job in my family, which I always feel I’m not good at. Last year, I attended a painting class, and the teacher of the class told me I have a vivid talent in this profession. Although I could feel this inner ability, I could never see this field as my profession since my age was at the stage that I could only consider it as entertainment, not a vocation. As a result of this, had I made a perfect decision about my profession at first, I would have recognized my talent earlier and in a better way.

To put it in a nutshell, having considered all the aforementioned reasons and examples, I do believe that it is better for children to choose a job different from their parents’ job. Not only do children may not be interested in their parents’ jobs, but they also may not be able to discover their talent and ability.

Votes

This essay topic by users

Post date	Users	Rates	Link to Content
2023-05-19	Umme Abiha	73	view
2023-05-19	Umme Abiha	66	view
2022-12-15	Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya	66	view
2022-12-15	Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya	66	view
2022-12-04	nida fatima	71	view

>>> More users practiced this topic >>>

Essay Categories

Independent TOEFL Writing

Essays by user Afruzi :

Write an essay by this topic

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, at least, i mean, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 81.0 43.0788530466 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2719.0 1977.66487455 137% => OK
No of words: 569.0 407.700716846 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77855887522 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74439950658 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448154657293 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 841.5 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0887242618 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.291666667 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7083333333 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95833333333 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386717960823 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120223390572 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139609530202 0.0737576698707 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308471050304 0.150856017488 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123211787266 0.0645574589148 191% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.