Some people think that hosting international sports events is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and static your opinion

For decades, many countries strive to be qualified as the hosting country of international sports events. While it is argued that this kind of events could bring harms to the hosting countries, it is undeniable that it also bring numerous benefits as well. In this essay, the arguments surrounding hosting international sports events will be discussed.

On the one hand, it is necessary for the hosting countries to spend a great amount of money on building stadium big enough for the events. It is argued that those stadium not only cost a lot of money but also go out of use after the events. For example, after the 2016 Rio Olympics, the stadium was reported to be left idle and in disrepair after the games. It is questionable whether the expenditure on those international events really benefits the people in the hosting countries or it might have gone into waste.

On the other hand, hosting such events helps the hosting countries shine on the international stage and consequencely bring benefits as well. Before the events, the governments of hosting counrties tend to invest in developing the hosting cities so as to show the best side of their countries to the world. Take 2008 Beijing Olympics for example, the Chinese government had made effort to reconstruct Beijing and improve the environment so the world would consider China as a highly developed country. Morever, during the period of the events, the players and their supporters around the world would gather in the hosting countries and benefit the countries' economy by tourism.

In conclusion, although it might be a waste of money to host an international sports event, I am convinced that the hosting countries could still benefit from it by attracting people around the world.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this stadium' or 'those stadia', 'those stadiums'?
Suggestion: this stadium; those stadia; those stadiums
...nough for the events. It is argued that those stadium not only cost a lot of money but also g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...invest in developing the hosting cities so as to show the best side of their countries t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...n the hosting countries and benefit the countries economy by tourism. In conclusion, a...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, still, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01023890785 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75180582936 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498293515358 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9389771011 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231037210513 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994703324131 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636211962295 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160388667029 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345812876792 0.056905535591 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this stadium' or 'those stadia', 'those stadiums'?
Suggestion: this stadium; those stadia; those stadiums
...nough for the events. It is argued that those stadium not only cost a lot of money but also g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...invest in developing the hosting cities so as to show the best side of their countries t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 649, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...n the hosting countries and benefit the countries economy by tourism. In conclusion, a...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, still, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01023890785 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75180582936 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498293515358 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9389771011 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231037210513 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994703324131 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636211962295 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160388667029 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345812876792 0.056905535591 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.