Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill. Do you agree or disagree?
Even though students at a certain level of education require practical skills, some schooling systems concentrate their efforts and time to learn facts rather than give students the possibility to develop their knowledge to practice activities outside classrooms. Although it is important to spend time on learning facts, it should be not forgotten that scholars must learn how to apply their knowledge in some practical areas.
Firstly, I would say that schools have to provide to every student the opportunity to practice their knowledge in certain areas. I have the experience to work in a company that produces mobile terminals and I was involved in a special program where some universities include a subject for their undergraduate students where they practice all their knowledge in many fields. The program includes plenty of options available for any students. They just need to do a small test to ensure they would join the correct area in the company. We have been getting good results and now the program has been implemented in more universities. This is an important step on getting enough practical skills before joining a real job.
Secondly, it is important to mention that more often companies are looking for young students that can potentially join them once their programs are concluded. However, companies need to ensure that universities allow students to combine their learning facts skills with practical skills. For that reason they are very active in getting the best candidates to support their needs and ensure that they will be enrolled aiming to succeed in their professional career in combination with companies strategies.
In summary, learning practical skills are very important for any educational system and it is impacting positively our society and bringing more young experienced people in many areas. This of course facilitates that companies can get the right persons in field but also benefits universities to develop their educational programs. As this essay has shown, educational systems need to move quickly from learning facts to learning practical skills.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-05-12 | hivafara77 | 78 | view |
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person s culture and character from their choice of clothes Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person s culture and character from their choice of clothes Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 38
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills I agree the people That problem have on the earth It is a big problem 56
- A government s role is only to provide defense capability and urban infrastructure roads water supplies etc All other services education health social security should be provided by private groups or individuals in the community Discuss both these views a 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at a certain level of education require practical skills, some schooling systems...
^^
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...end time on learning facts, it should be not forgotten that scholars must learn h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, look, second, secondly, so, in summary, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1775.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33033033033 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77024056561 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531531531532 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1014243389 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.785714286 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245298355609 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923950949175 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823629948079 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164424260427 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777020267513 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.