The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following chat provides some information about how many times the American people went to eat in fast food restaurants during a decade from 2003 till 2013.
As can be clearly observed from the chart, the percentage of people who went fast food restaurants every day fall slowly from under 5% to about 2% during 2003 to 2013. Similarly, the same pattern could be seen among individuals who never ate fast food between 2003 to 2013. There was a slight climb in percentage of Americans who attended a few times per a year in fast food restaurants from around 12% to approximately 15% at the same period.
On the other hand, the share of several-time-a-week fast food eaters fluctuated within 15% to 20% during 2003 to 2013. Despite the fact that the proportion of individuals who went fast food restaurants only once a week experienced a significant increase from above 30% to around 33% during 2003 to 2006, there was a sharp decline to nearly 28% in 2013.
It is clear from the chart that about 30% of American people ate fast food once or twice in a month in 2003. But it went downward sharply and reached 25% in 2006, after that it skyrocketed to more 33% in 2013.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-20 | Amarpreet Singh | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-21 | HappyCandy | view | |
| 2021-02-27 | sattar_iust | 56 | view |
| 2021-02-27 | sattar_iust | 61 | view |
| 2018-01-17 | Vickie | 82 | view |
- the table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after in was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same tow periods Summari 73
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience such as international travel and volunteering Support with examples or cases 88
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 89
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The charts below show the results of a survey if adult education The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared Write a report for a university lecturer descr 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59523809524 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66709605387 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528571428571 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.899409961 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259755893887 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136008034698 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608304427342 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181671273093 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288898342262 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.