Nowadays, job providers request candidates for personal information while recruiting. Some section of society believes that it voids individuals' personal privacy. Others with the opinion that this help recruiter in gauging the candidate. In my view, personal information should not be asked as personal choices don't affect the performance which an individual can deliver. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before reaching to a plausible conclusion.
Those who conceive that the personal information of prospective candidate matters argue that it aids them in selecting the right person for that job. For illustration, constructing industry usually ask job applicants about alcohol drinking habits as it can be hazardous to the person and those who around them if that person works under influence of alcohol. Besides the interviewer, the recruiter also asked for personal preference. As they see an opportunity to understand the prospective candidate which help them in placing the job applicant in the right company.
Those who opine that the interviewer doesn't have a right to ask personal questions argue that it voids the personal privacy of the individual. Most companies gauge the personal preference of job applicants in comparison with job requirements. For an instance, nowadays companies consider the prospective candidate social networking profile to gauge them. Many job aspirants believe that their academic and career performance be measured instead of their personal believes and opinions which they share over social networking sites.
To recapitulate, requesting for personal information during the interview is justified to some extend, but making a decision on the job applicant is ethically wrong. I believe that the personal information questionnaire should not be made compulsory for the job applicant but it should be kept as a personal choice, and this should not be a factor while selecting the candidate.
- The growth of online shopping will one day lead to all shops in towns and cities closing Do you agree or disagree 87
- You organized a party for a 90th birthday party in a hotel for a relative many elderly guests attended this party which is of great success Write a letter to thank the hotel manager In your letter give the details of the party the reason why the party was
- The disadvantages of tourism in less developed countries are as great as the advantages What is your opinion 77
- In Many Countries Paying For Things Using Mobile Phones Is Becoming Increasingly Common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 84
- Many people work long hours leaving very little time for leisure activities Does this situation has more advantages or more disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...should not be asked as personal choices dont affect the performance which an individ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ter also asked for personal preference. As they see an opportunity to understand t...
^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... Those who opine that the interviewer doesnt have a right to ask personal questions ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...ring the interview is justified to some extend, but making a decision on the job appli...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, while, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56711409396 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99792167097 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510067114094 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1289510428 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.6 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296775021338 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112396324583 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489732003413 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205437723804 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360195493016 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.