“Some experts opine that a new language should be introduced for all countries for international communication.”
Do you think the benefits of introducing a new international language will outweigh the problems?
It is asserted by linguistics that in order to ease the interaction among the different nations of the whole world, introduction of a new language should be done. Although a new and common language for all means elimination of language barrier, I believe the downsides of this outweigh the benefit as proficiency in a language takes years and even, a new language would meet opposition from many countries.
Initiating with the merit, international conferences and meetings are held where delegates from diverse nation are present. In these events, language becomes a limitation as those representatives are often comfortable in their native language. While, this introduction would immensely alter the situation and smooth communication can be in place when there would be one tongue of all. For an instance, English has been accepted as a global language which has dramatically reduced the cost which used to be incurred on translators or interpreters at international events. Therefore, this initiative could be a boon probably.
On contrary, there is no denial to the fact that it takes years to master any language as the learning will start from scratch which would be tedious task for many. Even, there are plenty of languages present in this world and adding a new would proliferate the burden only rather than doing any good. This can be better exemplified that humans end up learning maximum of 2-3 languages which they consider adequate for survival and have no will to learn a new one. Thus, I would totally consider it a mere wastage of time and effort.
Apart from this, a new language may be opposed by many elite nations as they would never like to accept a language that has no historical value for them. Its best example would be China which has never adopted English even because they consider that the importance of their mother tongue, Chinese, is beyond any other language. This means many countries would be reluctant to adopt it, thereby, offering no benefit to the introduction.
To reiterate, I am quite certain with the fact that present situation over languages is best suited and a new language would meet with a negative publicity despite of bringing a common platform of communication.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-02 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 67 | view |
| 2021-03-25 | manshu_d | 67 | view |
- Most people agree that money cannot be happiness Why is happiness difficult to define How can people achieve happiness 56
- Work is being done on the street where you live The noise is disturbing you Write a letter of complaint to your local council In your letter Introduce yourself Explain what the problem is Suggest solutions to the problem 78
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday When you got home you realised you had left your wallet there Write a letter to your friend In your letter thank your friend for the holiday explain that you left your wallet in their house give them ins 70
- he friend of yours is thinking of going on a camping holiday for the first time this summer He She has asked for your advice Write a letter to your friend In your letter 1 why you think your friend would enjoy a camping 2 Describe some possible disadvanta 93
- You recently went to a public event for example an exhibition festival or show that you think your friend would enjoy Write a letter to friend In your letter tell your friend what the event was explain why you think your friend would like the event invite 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, therefore, thus, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04076086957 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84420275432 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540760869565 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0275846664 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.86666666667 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311331714747 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106601822607 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741514256469 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185388543289 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720621835066 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.