The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European City in 1960 1980and 2000

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European City in 1960,1980and 2000.

The rendered pillar chat depicts the information about how the various modes of transportation used to make a regular Journeys in a single European city in 1960 to 2000. The data is calibrated into per centum.

In 1960, bus was the vehicle which showed the greatest interest of European people which was observed to be around 37%. This was followed by the tubes which reported above 25%. whereas, cars registered the least interest of European. The figure was recorded to be nearby 7%. After 20 years, in 1980 the maximum preferred transport for community by people were train and bus, both stood at almost 30%. The second preferred vehicle was private vehicles, which was increased by nearly 17%. Tubes are less popular among people in this year.

In 2000, the other hand, a remarkable increase was shown by car users in this year. It witnessed at approximately 38%. The public transport such as tube and bus become less familiar in 2000. This was recorded approximately 25% and 5% respectively.

From an overall analysis, it is vivid, in last year people show their greatest interest in private vehicles while public means of transport become demandable.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-03-26 Gagandhillon 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...ple which was observed to be around 37%.This was followed by the tubes which dreport...
^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...by the tubes which dreported above 25%. whereas cars registered the least interest of E...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...by the tubes which dreported above 25%. whereas cars registered the least interest of E...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...gistered the least interest of European.The figure was recorded to be near by 7%. A...
^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
... European.The figure was recorded to be near by 7%. After 20 years,in 1980 the maximum ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...ecorded to be near by 7%. After 20 years,in 1980 the maximum preferred transport fo...
^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'trained'.
Suggestion: trained
... transport for community by people were train and bus, both stood at almost 30%.The s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...train and bus, both stood at almost 30%.The second preferred vehicle was private ve...
^^^
Line 3, column 447, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , which
...d preferred vehicle was private vehicles,which was increased by nearly 17%.Tubes are l...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Tubes
...icles,which was increased by nearly 17%.Tubes are less popular among people in this y...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, whereas, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78136830179 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645502645503 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8379520729 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15392099669 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633982898694 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646790424723 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109243482803 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656575078247 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.