The chart below gives information about car ownership per household in the UK from 1975 to 2005.
The line graph illustrates the changes in car ownership proportion in the UK over 30 year-period, starting from 2005.
It can be seen from the graph while the percentage of people having two and three cars experienced an upward trend, the opposite was true for that of those having no car from 1975 to 2005. 1 car ownership rate remained the same despite a dip in 1985s.
At the beginning, nearly half of the British did not have regular use of a car. Around 43 % and 45% of people in the UK owned a car and no car, respectively. It was uncommon for families to own two or three cars with only around 5% for each ownership.
There were considerable changes in the car ownership figures in 1985. The biggest decline by nearly 20% was seen in the proportion of households having no car. From then, this figure continued to fall gradually, reaching at about 22% in 2005. Despite experiencing the same scenario in 1985, the percentage of 1 car ownership recovered at 45% at the end of the period. In contrast, the 2-car-ownership rose steadily to nearly 15% in 2005 while the figure for 3-car-ownership increased by two times, eventually reaching to approximately 10% in the end.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | chau hoang | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Raspreet | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | Wulan | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | nguyen thanh sang | 67 | view |
| 2022-10-24 | nguyen thanh sang | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 98
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 66
- The graph below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...remained the same despite a dip in 1985s At the beginning nearly half of the Brit...
^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not have regular use of a car Around 43 and 45 of people in the UK owned a car a...
^^
Line 4, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... reaching to approximately 10 in the end
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51442307692 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77166276088 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 208.0 22.4926829268 925% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 939.0 112.824112599 832% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 208.0 22.9334400587 907% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 24.0 5.23603664747 458% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276882470361 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.276882470361 0.103423049105 268% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186537711071 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348214112083 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 103.8 13.2329268293 784% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -122.72 61.2550243902 -200% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 82.0 10.3012195122 796% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.36 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 16.91 8.06136585366 210% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 85.2 10.9970731707 775% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 54.0 11.0658536585 488% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.