In the contemporary era, the majority sections of society much prefer to use electronic payment services rather than traditional time-consuming methods such as paying in cash. It seems to me that favorable features of this trend outweigh its undesirable aspects relying on some potent reasons and valid instances which will be discussed further in this essay.
To begin with, I believe electronic payment services offer a host of considerable plus points to our modern life. I suppose the most outstanding would be the halved risk of losing our paper money while you are carrying it surfing shopping canters. To dig more, paper money can be also robbed due to the fact that it is easily noticeable in the eye of robbers. Thanks to updated technology, by installing one app on your phone you will be able to pay off your bills, university tuition fees or any other daily expenses you are dealing with on a regular basis. Another obvious virtue could be the amount of time that is saved by using these useful applications. To clear things up I would illustrate an example of a 52-year-old Mexican seller who works in a shoe shop. He explains almost 10 years ago if we want to transfer money it took 2 to 3 working days as the process of banks were not really user friendly and swift. On the contrary, right now by just a single tap on your phone's screen, the process of payment is done in the blink of an eye.
Despite a host of beneficial features, these apps bring to our lives it is widely believed that this novel system of paying posses a number of shortcomings. I would highlight the main one which is the insure platform of the internet. In other words, online platforms sometimes lack the standard safety level for their users owing to the fact that hackers all around the world are always ready to attack financially related services. In fact, our information and our bank account ids can easily be hacked by genuine hackers. According to a survey conducted by a number of cyber detectors,58 percent of bank accounts are hacked yearly throughout these paying apps and merely 23 percent of these attacked cases can be detected and recognized. Nonetheless, there are certainly some measures to take to tackle this issue.
By way of conclusion, based on presented facts online paying services can bring its users some more positive points than negativity as it is a time-saving safe activity to follow.
- A friend of yours is thinking of going on a camping holiday for the first time in this summer He She has asked for your advice Write a letter to your friend In your letter Explain why you think your friend would enjoy a camping holiday Describe some possi 78
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skill Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say the main way to be happy in life is to have a lot of money How might having a lot of money make people happy What other things in life can make people happy 61
- In many countries paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 89
- The system used for rubbish garbage collection in your local area is not working properly This is causing problems for you and your neighbours Write a letter to the local council In your letter describe how the rubbish collection system is not working pro 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...I would highlight the main one which is the insure platform of the internet. In other word...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nonetheless, really, so, while, i suppose, in fact, such as, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79376498801 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65207435438 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613908872902 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8326480841 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.588235294 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5294117647 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124143710622 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351094921311 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272834049395 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729366503884 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00422974706234 0.056905535591 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.