This bar chart provides the information about the academic staff male and female proportions across 7 different faculties in 2012.
It is clear that the male to female ratios are fluctuated according to the faculty type. Men percentage is dominated in 4 out of 7 faculties and in equal with ladies in only one field.
Looking at the information in more details, we found that the hard professions like engineering, science, law and business was selected by men more than women. For example, Business, law, science and engineering faculties need more than studying, they need training, practices and after graduations they can work all the day outdoor. Moreover, women responsibilities after graduation and marriage are more than it for men. In contrast, arts and education' jobs are more flexible for ladies, they can work it for only few hours per day outdoor and also, they can work it indoor. Medicine faculty has many departments, some of these is preferable for ladies as children and ladies diseases. As a consequence, the final percentage of this faculty is equal in two the staff genders.
- Some people think that having a set retirement age e g 65 years for everybody regardless of occupation is unfair They believe that certain workers deserve to retire and receive a pension at an earlier age Do you agree or disagree Which types of workers do 56
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summa 67
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world why is this what are the advantages and disadvantages of these 56
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out In your opinion is it important for everyone to learn English Should we try to ensure the survival of local lang 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, so, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05494505495 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85739643845 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60989010989 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0593585266 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182455247995 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927953137891 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107833219693 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191457156816 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115674484755 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, so, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05494505495 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85739643845 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60989010989 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0593585266 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182455247995 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927953137891 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107833219693 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191457156816 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115674484755 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.