The protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world.
The first bar chart compares how much protein that citizens from four different regions take in while the second one illustrates how many calories they receive.
Overall, North Americans consume an excessive amount of protein and calories; in contrast, the protein and calorie intakes of three other areas are under the ideal line.
The total protein North Americans absorb is 80 percent, which is about 10 percent higher than the ideal intake. Specifically, they get the amount of protein from animals 3 times as high as from other sources (62 percent compares to 18 percent respectively). Similarly, although both Latin America and East Asia record the higher protein intake from fats and meats, they are still far behind the recommended line. In comparison, Indians get more protein from others, at 15 percent, which is slightly higher than from animals.
Meanwhile, the similar trend is seen in the order of calorie intakes when North Americans take in 3500 calories compared with 3000 calorie ideal intake. However, Latin America nearly reaches the recommendation, with approximately 2800 calories. Whereas, the other two regions are about two-thirds of the line.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-08 | hien3112 | 75 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | An Hai Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | eyraen | 84 | view |
- the graph shows the tourists came to Malaysia and Dubai from 1995 to 2003. 73
- In some countries the criminal trials are shown on TV and the general public can watch them Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantage 81
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009. 84
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same period. 89
- The chart gives information about the tons of air pollutants from different sources from 1990 to 2005. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tion, with approximately 2800 calories. Whereas, the other two regions are about two-th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, similarly, so, still, third, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29032258065 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56906001724 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7045990927 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.333333333 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208783745318 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841501941729 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710646805915 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139568509963 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402076377467 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.