The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in the London 2012 Olympic Games.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table indicates the number of gold, silver and bronze medals won by the top ten nations in the 2012 Summer Olympics which took place in Great Britain.
Overall, it can be seen that the rank was dependent on the number of gold medals achieved. Moreover, the United States won the largest number of medals among ten countries while Hungary had the least.
One of the most striking features shown in the table is that the USA was ranked on top thanks to 104 medals won in total, with 46 gold medals. This country was followed by China and Great Britain with a total of 88 and 65 medals, respectively. Although Russia gained more medals than Great Britain, this nation was ranked fourth with 24 gold medals compared to 29. Meanwhile, Australia won only 7 gold medals, standing at the last position.
Another noteworthy feature is the same number of gold medals achieved by Germany and France(11) which were ranked at sixth and seventh place, respectively, followed by Italy and Hungary with equally 8 gold medals. It is also worth noting that both South Korea and Italy won 28 medals in total, however, South Korea was ranked higher at fifth position with 13 gold medals compared to 8 gold medals won by Italy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-14 | Hoa Cẩm Tú | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s which took place in Great Britain. Overall, it can be seen that the rank wa...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries while Hungary had the least. One of the most striking features shown ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dals, standing at the last position. Another noteworthy feature is the same n...
^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... were ranked at sixth and seventh place, respectively, followed by Italy and Hung...
^^
Line 7, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...compared to 8 gold medals won by Italy.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73708920188 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26388462088 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558685446009 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4458333116 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.111111111 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189385959188 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974459249055 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658274045652 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150745547218 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566353205821 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.