The graphs below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts give information about the amount of people who go to the movies on all age group as well as comparing those attending cinema in term of different age groups from in the years of 1996 and 2000.
Overall, adolescents and younger people tended to go to the movies the most in the given period while senior citizens were less likely to attend cinema. In addition, there were significant fluctuations in the number of attendants, in 1997 the number of participants to cinema outnumbered in comparison with other aforementioned spans.
The average proportion of travel going to the movies in 1997 dominated followed by that in 1996 around 10.3. There was incredible equivalence in the average amount of visits with 8.3 and 8.2 in 1998, 2000 and 1999 in orderly. In addition, the percentage of visitors in the cinema were the remarkable same in figure in the years of 1997, 1998 and 2000 with 72% respectively. Besides, the amount in the aforementioned spans outnumbered comparing other ones. Next came the proportion of attendants on all age group in 1999 only 70% following by 62% of 1996.
At the beginning, the percentage of both adolescents and adult residents travelling to cinema was only 15% and 14% respectively, however those figures were significant higher than other ones. In 1997, the figure steadily increased to experience a decline trend in the next year. Both of them reached at the peak in 1999 with the remarkable equivalence nearly 15% and 24%. Since then the figures declined relatively in 2000. Incredibly, middle-aged and senior citizens showed the similar trend comparing to the aforementioned ones in each given year. At the beginning the amount of people in both of age group showed modest figures less than 14%. Between 1997 and 2000, the amount of those experienced significant fluctuations and were still out top in the list in 2000.
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 67
- The graph gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 73
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age group used to get daily news in one country in 2011 84
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time this can be benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ups from in the years of 1996 and 2000. Overall, adolescents and younger people ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...arkable equivalence nearly 15% and 24%. Since then the figures declined relatively in...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, still, then, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 33.7804878049 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 965.302439024 162% => OK
No of words: 313.0 196.424390244 159% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98402555911 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86683139526 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463258785942 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 283.868780488 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6192772024 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.428571429 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35714285714 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215025856565 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735437940826 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695240881918 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158310058151 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772496021997 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.