water salinity
Both the reading and the lecture talk about ways to reduce the salinity from the lake in order to save the fish population. The reading proposes three ways that can help desalinate the lake's water. However, the lecture disputes the ideas given in the passage. The professor said that it will be great if we can stop water's salinity and save the fish, but those methods proposed by the author of the passage are unrealistic or not practical.
To begin with, the author of the reading said that first choice is to remove the salt from the water in specific facilities for desalination. He said that water can be heated, evaporate into steam, then cooled down and return into the lake leaving the salt behind. This particular idea was challenged by the professor. She said that water evaporation will cause other health issues. When water evaporates, besides the salt it can leave behind other toxic chemicals that can be harmful for people's life. for example, she said it can leave selenium, and if people will breathe it it can be so dangerous for their health.
Furthermore, the reading part suggested that they can bring ocean water inside the lake to dissolve the salt. Yet, the lecture does not agree with this proposal. It said that bringing water inside the lake requires pipelines and they are so expensive to build considering the long distance of 100 000 kilometers, and the government may not have enough founds to support this.
Finally, the author of the passage said that one solution can be controlling the water's salinity by constructing walls that can help separate the water in couple sections. On the other hand, the lecturer opposes this proposal. She said that the walls are unlikely to work for long time. She said that if an earthquake may occur it will destroy the walls and the water will be mixed again.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-20 | shero | 80 | view |
| 2020-09-20 | talelaldabous | 71 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- glass and birds 73
- earthquakes 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Use specific reasons and examples to support your 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the salinity from the lake in order to save the fish population. The reading pr...
^^
Line 2, column 504, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...s that can be harmful for peoples life. for example, she said it can leave selenium...
^^^
Line 2, column 576, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...ve selenium, and if people will breathe it it can be so dangerous for their health. ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 82, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'waters'' or 'water's'?
Suggestion: waters'; water's
...hat one solution can be controlling the waters salinity by constructing walls that can...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77602523659 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38971015096 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511041009464 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8638495828 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0588235294 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275676025896 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923143196596 0.0996497079465 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895610822635 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184107828334 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639122731442 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.