According to the passage, population growth with contributing agricultural development negatively affected some species, especially the birds, and this will continue. However, the professor disagrees that the text claimed this result occurred because of three reasons and gives compelling examples to oppose.
First of all, the text says as population and settlements expand, the birds' natural habitats are getting smaller. Besides that, the traditional suitable areas decrease so it may continue to decline in the future. but on the other hand, the professor says urban development provides better habitats indeed. She gives the example of observed pray birds in the city, and they could hunt pigeons. Unfortunately, meanwhile, some populations shrink, others grow.
Second, the professor is against the growth of agriculture by destroying habitats, and the wilderness areas converted farming will continue; due to the need to convert fields is decreasing. By the novel techniques, there is more productivity in crops. Currently, agriculture is not in the way assumed in the text.
Third, insect poisons called chemical pesticides use does not increase as claimed as in the passage. traditional pesticides have drawbacks in nature and birds' life, but in the modern age, farmers do not often use pesticides since the genetically engineered pest-resistant developed. These pest-resistant crop technologies do not harm the birds so that the decline won't continue.
- 70
- 171 When students move to a new school they sometimes face problems How can schools help these students with their problems Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer
- In the past century the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States birds in particular Unfortunately for birds these trends are likely to con 90
- When students move to a new school they sometimes face problems How can schools help these students with their problems 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
... may continue to decline in the future. but on the other hand, the professor says u...
^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Traditional
... increase as claimed as in the passage. traditional pesticides have drawbacks in nature and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1251.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68636363636 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03103438144 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7409978757 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2307692308 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06452816374 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180036222237 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541463385882 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458670823044 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0935084621631 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580920897024 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.2367328918 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.42419426049 116% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.