Some think that governments should tax unhealthy foods to encourage people eat healthier. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that although fast food has played a vital role in life, it is also prone to illness. There are those who think that the government should impose a higher tax on this food to having a balanced life, while others state that this is not the case. In this essay, I will completely agree with the latter view.
The first point to make is that, in general, imposing a higher tax on junk food is not the best way to making healthier life. To explain, people have created a perennial habit regarding consuming fast food hence they will still order convenient food even costing an arm and a leg. For example, white-collar workers find it easy to buy a combo hamburger because they can spend time on other activities instead of cooking. As a result, people who use fast food as a routine will stem from economic burden when the government trying to encourage consuming healthier food by the higher tax.
Another compelling point is that higher taxes could be a barrier to economic development. To be more specific, convenient food has accounted for the vast majority of Gross Domestic Product in a great number of nations. For instance, there are several famous brands like KFC, Mcdonald apparently in the whole of big cities, it also contributed a large amount of money to the government. Furthermore, not only does it offer a large number of job opportunities but it also helps consuming products on the farm.
In conclusion, this essay supports the idea that imposing a higher tax on fast food could stem from harmful effects to the economy, however, it is ineffective to change consuming food habits because of fast food’s convenience. It is predicted that the government should raise resident’s awareness because it’s cost-effective to change behaviors.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-05-24 | leducanh.bk13 | 67 | view |
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- Some think that governments should tax unhealthy foods to encourage people eat healthier To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 422, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nt. Furthermore, not only does it offer a large number of job opportunities but it also helps con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to consume' or 'consume'.
Suggestion: to consume; consume
... of job opportunities but it also helps consuming products on the farm. In conclusion,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o helps consuming products on the farm. In conclusion, this essay supports the i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87128712871 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70295619302 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57095709571 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8982433509 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.538461538 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8461538462 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198514832791 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682301086059 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062286967171 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117614238688 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547973324813 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.