The reading passage and lecture both disccus massive extinctions that cause decline nspeciese polpulation. The author claims three explations to explain why this extinction happened. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article. She mentions, non of these explanations can provide a good information about the reasons below the extinction.
First, the writer states, decline of sea level is one reason of the inclination of species population. The lecturer in the other hand contradicts this explanstion. She says, the destrection of coastal habitat occure gratualy which might take several million years. This is enough time for species to be addapted with that change.
Second, the author points to massive climate cooling as another theory to extinction of species. He proposes, cilmate change causes widespread of valcanoes which releasesulfur dioxide that block sun light to reach earth and negitively effect on species life. This propposal is refuted by professor. She elaborates on lower in temperature occuer in a shot period of time. This cause release of sulfur dioxide to the atomspher., but this gas mied with the water that present in the air. At the end this miture will fell as arain to the earth.
Finally, the auther states asteriod strike earth sufaceand displace large amount of soil and rocks. this can be block sun light. The professor reputs this argument. She posits, the evidences show that volicanoes happened more earlier before extinction of species
occur.
The reading passage and lecture both disccus massive extinctions that cause decline nspeciese polpulation. The author claims three explations to explain why this extinction happened. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article. She mentions, non of these explanations can provide a good information about the reasons below the extinction.
First, the writer states, decline of sea level is one reason of the inclination of species population. The lecturer in the other hand contradicts this explanstion. She says, the destrection of coastal habitat occure gratualy which might take several million years. This is enough time for species to be addapted with that change.
Second, the author points to massive climate cooling as another theory to extinction of species. He proposes, cilmate change causes widespread of valcanoes which releasesulfur dioxide that block sun light to reach earth and negitively effect on species life. This propposal is refuted by professor. She elaborates on lower in temperature occuer in a shot period of time. This cause release of sulfur dioxide to the atomspher., but this gas mied with the water that present in the air. At the end this miture will fell as arain to the earth.
Finally, the auther states asteriod strike earth sufaceand displace large amount of soil and rocks. this can be block sun light. The professor reputs this argument. She posits, the evidences show that volicanoes happened more earlier before extinction of species
occur.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-05 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- Students have many hard school works which should be finished in correctly and in perfect time Whether students will learn more if they work on their assignment together or if they asked to work alone This can be weighed in many aspects Admittedly some ki 60
- The passage and lecture are both about portraits which may or may not painted by Rembrandt which is the famous of the seventeenth centry The author claims three reasons to explain why he believe that portrait was not to Rembrandt The lecture casts doubt o 60
- The reading passage and lecture both disccus massive extinctions that cause decline nspeciese polpulation The author claims three explations to explain why this extinction happened The lecture casts doubt on claim made in the article She mentions non of t 60
- Maintaining a friendships with friends is a crucial concern of individuals however which is important for our happines whether keeping this friendship with a restricted number of friends or make a new friends Some believe a samll number of friend is easy 76
- Skip to main content Independent Writing Question 1 00 00 Directions You have 30 minutes to plan and write your response Typically an effective response will be 300 words at least Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...o explain why this extinction happened. The lecture casts doubt on claim made in th...
^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...n lower in temperature occuer in a shot period of time. This cause release of sulfur dioxide t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...isplace large amount of soil and rocks. this can be block sun light. The professor r...
^^^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'earlier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: earlier
...evidences show that volicanoes happened more earlier before extinction of species occur.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore earlier before extinction of species occur.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3164556962 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66882223406 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662447257384 0.540411800872 123% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2235692778 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.0 110.228320801 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1666666667 21.698381199 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.94444444444 7.06452816374 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392617777124 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111862247987 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141371414872 0.0662205650399 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238325948741 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.237451442809 0.0443174109184 536% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.