The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
The bar chart demonstrates the spending money on fast foods per person per week by people with different level of wages in Britain, while the graph illustrates the consumption of fast foods from 1970 to 1990.
Looking at the bar chart, high income earners favored hamburger most, spending about 42 pence, followed by spending 19 and 17 pence on pizza, and fish and chips respectively. Also average income earners preferred hamburger most, spending around 32 pence, whereas they had the least preference for pizza (spending 5 pence) and expenditure on fish and chips was 25 pence. Unlike to above-mentioned groups, the low income earners favored fish and chips most, spending around 17 pence, followed by spending 13 and 5 pence on hamburger and pizza respectively.
Moving to the graph, the consumption of pizza was about 50 grammes in 1970 and by 1990 it had increased considerably and reached to 280 grammes. In addition, the consuming of hamburger was 90 grammes in 1970 and had grown substantially and reached to 500 grammes by 1990. However, the consumption of fish and chips declined slightly from 300 grammes in 1970 to 200 grammes in 1990.
In conclusion, the less income people had, the less preference for fast foods they had. Moreover, since 1970, the consumptions of pizza and hamburger, unlike to the consumption of fish and chips, have been on the increase.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-29 | kaushalpatel569 | 56 | view |
- In some countries the average wight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes for these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them. 80
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 76
- At present the media affects people s lives significantly What impact does this have on the society Is it a negative or a positive development 68
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors-agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services-to the UK economy in the twentieth century.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons 70
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 nad 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comp 70
Comments
the given bar chart
the given bar chart represents the amount of money per week spent on fast foods (junk foods) in great Britain , the first chart illustrated the money expenditure on fast foods per a weekly basis , while the second bar chart represents the data about how the consumption demand on fast food changed over the time period of 20 years between 1970 to 1990
Looking at the bar graph high income earners are interested in Hamburger most, spending above 40 pence per a week, while fallowed by the spending around 15 to 20 pence on pizza, and fish and chips respectively, And also average earners preferred on hamburgers, spent above 30 pence per weekly ,whereas they spent least on pizzas, while expenditure on fish and chips above 30 pence per a week , low income earners favored for the fish and chips ,the
The bar chart demonstrates the spending money on fast foods
The bar chart demonstrates the money spent on fast foods
high income earners favored hamburger most, spending about 42 pence, followed by spending 19 and 17 pence on pizza, and fish and chips respectively.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
the low income earners favored fish and chips most, spending around 17 pence, followed by spending 13 and 5 pence on hamburger and pizza respectively.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
flaws:
More sentences varieties wanted. Don't always use 'favored....', 'respectively'
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 229 200
No. of Characters: 1110 1000
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.89 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.847 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.718 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 70 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 57 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.166 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.498 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.793 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.221 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4