Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.
Skills do not only come from reading books; yet, they can be developed through active indoor and outdoor participation. Some studies also suggested that by exercising this activity, children can ameliorate their skills and creativity. In this point, I am a strong advocate of the study result considering insufficiency of books to provide necessary elements helping children to grow their skills faster.
While I know that reading can supply children with much knowledge, practical activities can encourage them to develop skills faster. By remaining active, children can encounter real challenges, which sometimes are not written in books. Even if so, reading books seems to solely train our memory, not a real practice to perform our skills. To illustrate, A child who is avid of reading books for improving his skills cannot practically perform skills which have already been perused. In contrast, a kid who just practices a skill without having read a book for a specific skill can show a better result. This, according a research, is natural as by practicing, all muscles and nerves in our body work simultaneously, enabling a better synchronisation of all body parts.
Moreover, a real activity allows children to be more creative. Not like books that only furnish children with myriad texts and theory, doing a fun activity will let them encounter a specific problem. However, parents are too concerned if their kids face a problem, in which engenders the potency brought by the problem to underpin their children’s development. In fact, this unexpected situation can, instead, push them to figure out how to solve the problem and then indirectly, will grow their creativity. In many cases, books, otherwise, disallow children from possessing this advantage.
All in all, despite all benefits offered by practical activities, I strongly recommend that children be accompanied by parents or adults while attempting to apply skills. Without a helpful guide, children will not be able to benefit optimally from doing a physical activity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | jishal12 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | annaalysia007 | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-29 | samuel961 | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | lariarhydes | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-04 | Nguyễn Ninh | 84 | view |
- The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on fuel 80
- The diagram below shows a possible future means of home energy production 11
- Global Warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measure can government and individuals take to tackle the issue 84
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 80
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 770, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tter synchronisation of all body parts. Moreover, a real activity allows childre...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, in contrast, in fact, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32407407407 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88779887371 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598765432099 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9151434373 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8125 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179780828257 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066347269571 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639947517798 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104869563664 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535561509662 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.