The graph below compares the weekly wages by age and gender in the united states in 2015
The given bar chart compares the weekly salaries of American men and women categorized in five age groups in 2015.
Overall, it can be seen that the weekly wages of males increased gradually until the age of 45-54, where they stabilized at around $1000 per week. Women's weekly wages rise dramatically in the first two age brackets, but then they were steady with a slight decrease as women aged.
To begin with, comparing the two sexes' earnings, women's wages were significantly lower than men's. More specifically, men in the 16-24 age group earned as much as $62 more than women. The (25-34) year-old age bracket also showed a substantial difference with men earning $771 per week, while females earned much less at $669 weekly. Likewise, the salaries were again disparate between the genders in the (34-44) year-old category, with women earning around $200 less than men. While men continued to earn more in the (45-54) year old age group, women's wages experienced a slight decrease, so that there was a $200 difference between the two sexes. Lastly, men and women aged 55 or older earned more than $700 per week with men's disparity.
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting t 73
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn 84
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this sets a bad example to young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Smacking children is the best form of discipline To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this a positive or negative situation 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 687, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... women aged 55 or older earned more than 00 per week with mens disparity.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, likewise, so, then, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80829015544 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45425270331 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60103626943 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0422623058 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192549694976 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983123968627 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514390071283 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16714239331 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392121945408 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.