It is true that Middletown has put a ban on the use of cell phones while using on the road. After this, they heard no complaints, and cases of sidewalk incidents have gone down significantly. But if the same should be done by the council of Centerville is not true as this conclusion would be vague as lots of assumptions are there which invalidate the claim made and subjected to fallacy.
It might be the case the structure of the sidewalk of Middletown is not congested. The main cause of the sidewalk incidents is recklessness shown by pedestrians while talking on cell phones. They have been found engaged in texting, talking over cell phones, which results in walking into the road or bump into other walkers. These might be the reason for such sidewalk accidents. Therefore, they banned the cause of the accidents which helped in curbing the number of sidewalk accidents. But we do not know whether it is the same situation with respect to the city council of Centerville. The assumption that the structure of the sidewalk of Centerville is the same as that of Middletown and the root cause lies in the negligence of people due to too much indulged in phones while being on road invalidates the claim.
If the structure of the sidewalk is congested or extended due to which sidewalk accidents are occurring then banning cell phones would be futile.
The cause of the accidents has not been stated in the argument. The lack of proper scientific study to know the root cause of the accidents has not been made which invalidates the claim made. The increasing number of accidents may be due to the deteriorating law and order situation over there. Therefore, banning cellphones without knowing the root cause is not going to be worthy.
There is no statistical study done to enumerate the number of complaints. It might be the case that the people of Middletown have not got time to lodge the complaints. The study of the behavior of the people must be done to make a conclusion. There has not been stated any correlation between banning cell phones and number of the complaints by providing statistical data regarding the same.
Therefore, at the last, I conclude that taking the decision to curb any menace on the basis of what others have done to curb the same might not be fruitful. The proper study must be done to take any decision. The conclusion is full of unwarranted assumptions and needs to be verfied.
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 33
- Technology while apparently aimed to simplify our lives only makes our lives more complicated
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 16
- Technology while apparently aimed to simplify our lives only makes our lives more complicated 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 50
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... made which invalidates the claim made. The increasing number of accidents may be d...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, it is true, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 55.5748502994 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 422.0 441.139720559 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7654028436 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71708789956 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417061611374 0.468620217663 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 624.6 705.55239521 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7507260861 57.8364921388 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4090909091 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.70786347227 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105607319112 0.218282227539 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371792123541 0.0743258471296 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352969319451 0.0701772020484 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.059116760411 0.128457276422 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424803166763 0.0628817314937 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.3799401198 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.5979740519 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.32208582834 88% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... made which invalidates the claim made. The increasing number of accidents may be d...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, it is true, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.6327345309 148% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 55.5748502994 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 422.0 441.139720559 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7654028436 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71708789956 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417061611374 0.468620217663 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 624.6 705.55239521 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.96107784431 161% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7507260861 57.8364921388 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4090909091 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.70786347227 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 6.88822355289 203% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105607319112 0.218282227539 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371792123541 0.0743258471296 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352969319451 0.0701772020484 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.059116760411 0.128457276422 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424803166763 0.0628817314937 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.3799401198 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.5979740519 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.32208582834 88% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.