Nowadays, museums charge for admission is debatable. Some people think that the admission fee of any museums is not ideal while others believe there are more benefits of free entry in the museums. This essay will discuss why the advantages of the entry fee in the museum do in fact outweigh the disadvantages.
If museums charge for entry, it will affect economic growth for travel in nations and the funds for ancient things, history and arts. Moreover, the importance of tourism for the museum will increase. For example, there are plenty of museums in India and they are not freely available for entry, so they are financially stable. As a result, they can improve the facilities for the traveller who are visiting. However, the economic sustainability of tourism will also rise. In short, because of the funds and economic growth, it is crucial to charge for entry into museums.
Although there are lots of advantages of paid entry in museums, it will decrease the number of visitors. Moreover, anyone cannot go to the museum. For instance, there are lots of students who are showing interest in artefacts, historical research and artistic but they do not have enough money to enter into museums. In addition, the identity of culture will get obsolete. Overall, the identity of the culture and history of any nations will be obsoleted in the future that is the reason why the museum should not charge for entry in museums for pupils.
It is increasingly likely that charging entry fee in the museum has several benefits. However, there has been required to increase provisions for visitors. Ultimately, there are lots of prons of entry fee and which leads to positive aspects for museums in the future.
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 58
- The charts below show that what UK graduate and postgraduates students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections untill 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comaparisons where relevant 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95833333333 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56173769149 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479166666667 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8800103424 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433365914318 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147969695868 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11342884526 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285128603008 0.151304729494 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115141828967 0.056905535591 202% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.