The given two line graphs delineate the data regarding how much time spent on household chores and how ownership were changing according to electrical things in one nation from 1920 to 2019.
Overall, it can be seen that, the number of hours per week was showing downward trend whereas, the percentage of household with electrical appliances was increased along the period.
It is crystal clear that, in 1920 the proportion of refrigerator starts from 0% and reached 100% between 1920 ans 2019. A dramatic increase was observed in the percentage of refrigerator. From 1980 to 2019 the percentage of fridge was remained same at 100%. However, the similar criteria was followed by vacuum cleaners which begun at 30% and accounted 100% in 2019. On the contrary,washing machine was the merely gadget which had slight decrease in 1960. After that it rose up and reached near about 72%
Moving Further, maximum time spent on housework such as washing clothes, preparing meals and cleaning was around 50 hours per week in 1920. Following this, the number of hours per week was decline rapidly and reached 10 hours per week in 2019.
- Obesity was once considered a disease of adults however it is becoming increasingly common among children Why do you think this is happening What can be dome to help children stay healthy 78
- Task 1 IELTS Writing Model Cambridge 8 Test 4 Goods transported in UK 1974 2002 my friends version 67
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 77
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Music is played in every society and culture in the world today Some people think that music brings only benefits to individuals and societies Other however think that music can have a negative influence on both Discuss these views and give your own opini 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... over the period and comprised at 100%. While, washing machine was the merely gadget ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, regarding, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 1615.20841683 61% => OK
No of words: 199.0 315.596192385 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98994974874 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51329637533 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613065326633 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 506.74238477 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0937625893 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159224144435 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575840164534 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627556588917 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106187817898 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587542116985 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.