These days, only few young people enjoy classical music concerts or play or play classical music. Why? Should young people be encouraged to attend and learn more?
These days, people possess distinct standpoints regarding the variety of music tastes among the entire society. Many opine that the classically musical performances are recently ostensibly unfamiliar with the youngsters. From my perspective, I wholly concur that a majority of adolescent express little interest in this genre of music. This essay will analyze some chief reasons and explanations for the mentioned opinion.
Initially, owing to its uncommon nature, the classical genre is progressively faded into oblivion. With the contrarian view, classical music is ostensible to be not highly recommended on ubiquitous social networks. Additionally, it is undeniable that there are a minority of classical music concerts which are organized regularly even in the metropolises. These result in limiting assessable resources of the youngster as they merely enjoy the classical songs through recorded videos. Consequently, those next generations could hardly approach and get into this style of music.
Although classical music performances are immensely worth being attention more, it is not essential to incline adolescents toward appreciating this genre. A majority of people have their different taste of music, they had better independently decide their favorite one that may assist them in unwinding or releasing stress. This genre may considerably catchy for supporters, nevertheless, those performances are hard to totally feel if they do not voluntarily interest. Therefore, interfering in others’ hobbies may generate a reluctance in choosing various types of music and losing the practical value of music foundation.
In conclusion, through the aforementioned reasons, although classical music is such a long-established one, it is likely to be not a priority choice of many youngsters. Also, to preserve the literal value of music, encouraging the young generation to perform or learn this type is unnecessary.
- The restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money on building new houses and roads Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The bar chart below shows the sales of jeans for two companies last year in Turkey 78
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime 84
- A growing number of people rely on restaurants and convenience food frozen food and packaged meals rather than home cooked food to supply most of their meals What are the advantages and disadvantages of eating this way 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he practical value of music foundation. In conclusion, through the aforementione...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77192982456 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20432917379 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642105263158 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.963735393 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298950327752 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964477528947 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532000172809 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182370553974 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306457109299 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.45 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.