Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this notion?
It has been observed that the price of patrol should be surged in order to reduce traffic congestion. Certainly, What I reckon is that this is a rational approach, which needs to be opted for its. Reasons behind my nepotism are discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
To engender with, escalating values of fuels for vehicles are advantageous by the sake of ruin traffic jam. To elaborate it, if prices of petroleum are increased, then people would avoid to taking a vehicle in short distance walking. Hence, bicycles will later become most preferable option to drive. Besides this, there will also be a downfall in pollution rate since vehicles be it, motor bikes or cars will neither be opted to use, nor produce unnecessary smoke from an engine. For example, in India masses ignore to choosing a bike ride when it is not necessary owing to high rates (94.07) of fuels ranging from patrol to diesel.
Similarly, to previous merits, another positive to incline prices of patrol for mitigating traffic jam is related to economical enhancement of a nation. In other words, petrol will sooner donate a huge fund of money to
government bodies because of high prices make relatively large percentage of profit. Eventually, this money will be invested to resolve existing traffic threats and construction of new roads, thus there will be an availability of more space to drive a vehicle.
In conclusion, by giving a proper destination to the view point of increasing price in petroleum, traffic jam issues can be resolved, with an addition of more space to drive a vehicle will be available, that will thank to economic growth of a country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
- The chart below show the proportion of the energy produced from different source in a country between 1985 and 2003 56
- The average standard of people s health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The graph below gives information about U..S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008. 73
- Should children be allowed to play violent video games 73
- The chart below show the proportion of the energy produced from different source in a country between 1985 and 2003 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, hence, if, similarly, so, then, thus, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, in short, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95289855072 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70825274952 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7179017267 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.916666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12157432631 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453584753808 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299677058814 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744704539167 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123628223217 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.