salvage logging
The reading and the lecture are both about a kind of methods in order to deal with the outcomes of natural disasters which happens in forests frequently, called salvaged logging. Three theories are provided in the article about approaches to counteract the consequence of these disasters. In the contrary, the professor is not convinced of the solutions and casts doubt on each of these theories. The lecturer is of the opinion that these solutions may lead to long-term damages to the forest and are not as efficient as is mentioned in the reading.
To begin with, the author argues that one way is to clean up the forest from damaged trees. To be more specific, dead trees’ decomposition is a long-lasting procedure and eliminating them free up the space for other fresh plants and trees to grow. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. According to the professor, annihilating destructed trees and avoiding decomposition procedure, which in spite of being long-lasting is fruitful for soil, do not provides proper condition for new trees. Furthermore, he asserts that decomposed organisms enrich soil and is necessary for new generation.
Secondly, the writer dispute that devastated trees provide insects an appropriate environment to grow and live which is harmful the health of the forest. The lecturer, on the other hand, oppose this notion by mentioning that although these trees increase the population of insects, however, they also help nestling important contributors such as birds.
Finally, the author averts that salvage logging can provides economic benefits for the community. To delineate, many industries are depended on forest’s wood for particular products and also since salvage logging requires workers, it leads to a blooming job opportunity. In contrast, the professor’s stance is that this approach brings about only small and short-term advantages. The lecturer puts forward to the idea that utilizing forest’s wood for industry requires apparatus that are extensive to maintain. Moreover, jobs that are created by salve logging are temporary and outsider workers are more accomplished and adept than local human resources.
- is it better to preserve a long-term friendship with a few people or to find new friends easily 76
- Which one of the reasons is most important in helping students to study in colleges and universities 76
- many high schools and universities require students to work on projects in groups and all members of the group receive the same grade mark on the project Do you agree or disagree that giving every member of a group the same grade is a good way to evaluate 73
- were dinosaurs feathered 80
- : In general, people are living longer now. Discuss the causes of this phenomenon. Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 464, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'provide'?
Suggestion: provide
...ng-lasting is fruitful for soil, do not provides proper condition for new trees. Further...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to nestle' or 'nestle'.
Suggestion: to nestle; nestle
...ion of insects, however, they also help nestling important contributors such as birds. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 53, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
... author averts that salvage logging can provides economic benefits for the community. To...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, kind of, such as, in spite of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 340.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41470588235 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91752104804 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 145.348785872 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597058823529 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8640562567 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0625 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06452816374 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145385445381 0.272083759551 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474544958253 0.0996497079465 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942819047779 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0800396414473 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110979554202 0.0443174109184 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.42419426049 119% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 63.6247240618 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.