Traffic congestion is a growing problem in many cities today. What are some of the causes of traffic congestion and what measures can be taken to help reduce it?
Nowadays, it is not uncommon that traffic congestion has become an issue for countless cities around the world. The following essay will provide two major causes contributing to traffic jams, and give some feasible solutions to solve this problem.
To begin with, private cars have been prioritized when it comes to traveling short distances because there has not been safe public transportation for people to rely on. It is believed that pickpocketing on public transports has been so critical that people would try to avoid it at all costs. This belief, as a result, may turn people away from public transports. In addition, another notable cause is that anyone can purchase a car these days. With the help of financial institutions, there would be no trouble filling out the form of lending loans for buying a car. Thus, these two roots of issue contribute to an overwhelming number of cars filling up our streets and eventually causing traffic congestion.
Fortunately, there are two possible ways to tackle this issue. First, governments should allocate more financial resources to improve the public transportation system. With a more secure system, by installing cameras on public transports, for example, people would feel safe using these means of transportation since they would not be worried about issues like pickpocketing anymore. Another effective remedy is to raise the taxes on cars, so people would be discouraged from buying and using the vehicles and consequently public transports would be a valid alternative. For instance, in Spain, car taxes are so high that more than half of the daily commuters choose the train, bus, or subway rather than their cars.
To sum up, it is undeniable that a poor public transportation system and the accessibility to cars nowadays have been creating a serious problem of traffic congestion, but I believe that higher taxes and an enhanced public transportation system would put a halt to this matter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-15 | ivantran | 89 | view |
| 2018-11-20 | JimmyMcgill | 70 | view |
- Many students choose to take a gap year before starting university to travel or gain work experience Do you think this is a good idea or a waste of time 73
- The graph shows the percentage of people who recycle their rubbish in five countries over 12 years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 75
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept aa bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...r example, people would feel safe using these means of transportation since they would not ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bus, or subway rather than their cars. To sum up, it is undeniable that a poor ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, may, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17924528302 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88094253879 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594339622642 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5100677322 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.642857143 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116341420657 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447984396291 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534161955372 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933357700088 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774399666285 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.