People tend to work longer hours nowadays. Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted. Do you agree or disagree?
Working longer hours has become more and more prevalent in today’s society, which has a severe impact on both workers themselves and their family or the community as a whole. Hence, I totally agree with the idea of limiting working hours.
There are several reasons why long hours of working are considered harmful to individuals. To embark on, in earlier times, people used to work only 8 hours a day. These days, nevertheless, average daily working hours have almost increased up to between 11 and 14 hours, which adversely affects people’s health and productivity. For instance, those who spend longer hours working tend to take up inadequate physical activities and therefore are more likely to suffer from various health issues, ranging from stress, fatigue to more serious diseases such as depression. Falling health, consequently, leads to regular sick leave, poor performance at work, low productivity, which not only causes great damage to the company but also threatens employees’ quality of life.
Equally importantly, I also believe that extended hours of work have negative impacts on families and communities. Firstly, busy working schedules prevent parents from talking and playing with their children. This is extremely detrimental to the development of youngsters as without careful supervision of parents, they stand a higher chance of committing violence or criminal activities in life. On top of that, the bond between people in the family is weakened as well, resulting in constant misunderstanding between members. Secondly, in terms of community life, overworked people seem not to have enough time to devote to voluntary activities that bring about various benefits to the society.
By way of conclusion, I reaffirm my state that a restricted working hours legislation should be adopted; otherwise, individuals themselves, family, and society would suffer as a result.
- The maps below depict two different subterranean tunnel systems in two Australian cities 78
- WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The following is a diagram of the mobile phone recycling process Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 wo 78
- WRITING TASK 2 You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Men and women are different in terms of their characteristics and abilities For this reason some jobs are better done by men and others by women Do you agree or 67
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 61
- Some people say that with the considerable benefits computers and internet bring about they can completely replace the traditional role of a teacher Do you agree or disagree with it 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
... threatens employees’ quality of life. Equally importantly, I also believe that extend...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hours'' or 'hour's'?
Suggestion: hours'; hour's
...firm my state that a restricted working hours legislation should be adopted; otherwis...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as a result, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44745762712 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91703532505 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657627118644 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9017175144 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.615384615 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9230769231 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409757305015 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142026546016 0.084324248473 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880346619864 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241474975117 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464208471561 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.