Computers do help children to learn more effectively On the contrary their usage has a negative effect on both the physical and mental development of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Computers do help children to learn more effectively. On the contrary, their usage has a negative effect on both the physical and mental development of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

More and more people use electronic devices, especially computers, for work and entertainment in today's technology era. Children now often learn through computers, which seems to make learning more effective. Besides, the others think that allowing children to use many computers will affect their physical and mental development - I agree with the second opinion.
The first main pitfall is that using the computer for a long time per day affects physical health gradually. What will happen with the eyes if a child plays video games too much and spends a bunch of time looking at the computer’s screen containing many unstable transpositions, colourful visualization?. The answer is that child will suffer from vision problems such as nearsightedness, astigmatism, or farsightedness. Moreover, sitting in front of the computer for a while will lead to obesity, bone-related diseases due to limited body movement.
Mental health is another main pitfall if children use computers frequently. Specifically, long-term high-frequency computer use can lead to electronic device addiction. Some children tend to see hallucinations and have uncontrollable behaviours because they are too addicted to online games. In addition, immersing in the virtual world makes people gradually tend to be anti-society, so they are passive and do not want to interact with others. Finally, children's minds are very naive so that they cannot partly sense what should be learned online and what should not; therefore, when they see negative things online, they will be haunted, panic, and mentally depressed.
In conclusion, children should not have too much exposure to computers and networks; but instead, learn through direct interaction. They can learn by computer but under the supervision of their parents, who have the ability to perceive and distinguish right from wrong.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-07 LUCIALUSO 89 view
2021-08-07 LUCIALUSO 89 view
Essays by user LUCIALUSO :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54035087719 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06427988893 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624561403509 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4581281557 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.785714286 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215384227168 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709521282062 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464701055937 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12851184288 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584404754574 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.