Many school children today take part in work experience sessions for short periods of time instead of attending school is this a positive or a negative development
Nowadays, the trend is becoming popular that schoolchildren are engaged in practice instead of lesson. In my opinion, there are both adverse and positive effects behind this phenomenon which we will discuss here.
On the one hand, there are undeniable disadvantages. First of all, these practice courses time consuming. In other words, practises eat up study time, therefore, youngsters will not be able to gain neither experience nor knowledge, because without sufficient knowledge about a certain area, it is impossible to gain experience by doing practice. For example, most Asian schools are systematized for learning without practice; hence, children with interest, completely immersed in study. Moreover, In order to take part in practice sessions students need to be educated and provided with sufficient knowledge. If they start practicing without a full stock of knowledge, this can lead to the fact that the children will lose interest in the future profession. As a result they will not study hard after praxis due to unwillingness.
On the flip side, there are various benefits of practical exposure. Firstly, just by practicing one’s problem-solving skills will be developed. As a result of practicing, people will quickly cope with problems. As an example, in daily life when faced with challenges individuals learn to solve problems. Besides, practicals will prepare them in advance for their future lives. Thus, by allowing children to work in temporary sessions, we can awaken in them a love for their future profession. For example young teacher cannot gain experience, however this is gradual process which can be evolved by practice.
In conclusion, I believe that practical training can be considered as a positive development. Nevertheless, there are disadvantages such as the loss of precious time and the lack of data about the field in which the practice has to be done, which can lead to aversion to the future profession.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-14 | samdilnura | 75 | view |
- Over sugar consumption is unhealthy Some people think that governments should take responsibility to control it Others think that individuals should take responsibility of sugar intake Discuss both the views and give your opinion 87
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 84
- In many countries today there are concerns about the unhealthy lifestyles that people lead What health issues are linked to modern lifestyles What answers to these problems can you suggest 84
- Unemployment remains the biggest challenge to school leavers in most countries How far do you agree with this assessment What other challenges face young people today 84
- Some people thinks it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them Other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to aversion to the future profession.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33656957929 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97312913666 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595469255663 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.409773526 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6111111111 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5555555556 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148845072175 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411559855923 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039351396634 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081912590294 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428225230643 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.