Many people believe that students in remote areas should be given bonus points in the national graduation exam. Others believe that no one should be given that advantage. Discuss both points and give your opinion?
It is undeniable that the education systems in urban areas are better than those in remote areas. Although a number of people believe that students from far-flung regions should be given bonus point in the entrance examination to universities and colleges, I would argue that no one should be given that advantage for a variety of reasons.
On the one hand, advocates of the idea of giving students bonus points in the national graduation exam base their opinion on the fact that students in remote areas have more limited access to learning facilities and references. For instance, while the use of the Internet is widespread in urban cities, in some mountainous areas where the living standard is quite low, some students have never heard of the term “Internet” and even have to struggle to go to school by means of part-time and farm work. As a consequence, those students’s education backgrounds are relatively disadvantageous compared to those in urban areas, and that many people believe that they should be given more opportunities in the entrance examination in universities and colleges.
On the other hand, being given bonus points can result in bad habits and misconceptions. This new policy may cause many students to bear in mind that they will easily get admitted to prestigious universtities just with a little hard work and preparation. Consequently, they will neglect their studies and be easily lured by entertainment factors such as video or electronic games. In addition, living in far-flung areas does not mean that students can’t have access to universities and colleges. Many students who come from remote regions still become a top-school student or even high the highest scores in the national graduation exam because they are determined to achieve their goals to open a brighter future door and to support their parents.
To conclude, regardless of their education background, non students should be given advantage in the national graduation exam because this can place their under wrong conceptions which can ruin their opportunities and their future door.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-08-18 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 73 | view |
- In natural scenic spots such as lakes mountains and beaches there is much litter or rubbish Why do people do that How to deal with it 94
- Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not effective Education and job training should be used instead Do you agree or disagree 67
- Many people believe that students in remote areas should be given bonus points in the national graduation exam Others believe that no one should be given that advantage Discuss both points and give your opinion 73
- With the pressure on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school e g physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 61
- In some countries people are no longer allowed to smoke in public and office places Do you think it is a good rule 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, may, so, still, while, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22551928783 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91332706281 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522255192878 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.1522360068 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.090909091 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6363636364 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409613697365 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150324486557 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12569785284 0.0667982634062 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265977940096 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101722415389 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.