TPO 61
The golden frog is on the edge of extinction because they are afflicted by a type of fungus which hampers their cardinal functions. Both the reading and the listening discuss this issue. The passage suggests three measures for saving the golden frog from the infection. The lecture, however, refutes the feasibility of the author’s solutions.
First, the passage states that scientists can inject the golden frog’s skin with a specific kind of bacterium which releases chemicals that exterminate the fungal cells. By doing so, they can preserve the golden frog by eliminating its infection to the fungus. Nonetheless, the lecturer opposes this solution by arguing that this approach has already been put into action for some of the frogs; although initially effective, the bacteria could produce the chemicals, which kill the fungus, only for a short amount of time after they have been injected into the frog’s skin. For this, introducing bacteria to the golden frog’s skin is not a permanent answer to the issue and cannot immune the frogs.
Second, according to the passage, another possible solution is fostering the golden frog in isolated environments where no traces of the fungus exist. By doing so, pure frogs with no fungus infections will be born and can be introduced to the wildlife. These free-fungus frogs can reproduce in nature and result in a healthy population. Nevertheless, the professor rejects this idea by saying that, in the natural world, these healthy frogs are highly at risk of infection since other animals, having the same illness, are afflicted by the fungus. Accordingly, they can contaminate the pure golden frogs.
Third, the passage goes on mention that some golden frogs have an innate resistance to the fungus. In other words, they reduce the rate of infection in their bodies, by enhancing their body temperature. If all golden frogs acquire this defense mechanism, they may become immune from the disease. The professor, on the other hand, disagrees with this idea by expressing that true, this natural defense keeps the golden frog safe from fungus infections, but this mechanism has several disadvantages. For diminishing the fungus affliction, the frogs should consume a great deal of energy to raise their body temperature. This excessive use of energy lessens their strength. Having said that they might be immune from the fungus, but they are not capable to survive other diseases. Consequently, this natural ability is not a good solution for protecting the golden frog.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-18 | janfaisal | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-11 | Ali Talaei | 76 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | محسن حمیدی پور | 85 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-25 | Percival Wong | 71 | view |
- Some charitable organizations allow people who give money to charity to choose how their donation will be used If you were give money to charity would you prefer to choose how your donation is going to be used or do you think it is more effective to leave 70
- TPO 65 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children nowadays rely too much on the technology such as computers smartphones and video games for fun and entertainment playing with simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for c 80
- tpo 57 80
- Which of the following people are in the most need for government financial support 1 Older people who cannot work 2 Young families with children 3 Temporarily unemployed young people 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ch has already been put into action for some of the frogs; although initially effective, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the issue and cannot immune the frogs. Second, according to the passage, anothe...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, third, kind of, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1373.03311258 155% => OK
No of words: 407.0 270.72406181 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23341523342 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65404036104 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 145.348785872 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 419.366225166 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.9139015444 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.428571429 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.380952381 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90476190476 7.06452816374 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.589499877019 0.272083759551 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199621097181 0.0996497079465 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103387744197 0.0662205650399 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.390394317489 0.162205337803 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560193553084 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 63.6247240618 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.