Friends play an extremely significant role in individuals lives because their beliefs and actions affect the way individuals think and do. An unavoidable question which has been always the topic of contention and brought about heated debates is what is important to have a long-lasting friendship. Different individuals adhere to the belief that sharing the same interests and hobbies is the most vital concept to have a strength friendship, which I concur with it. I believe in this way for two crucial reasons. First, having same interests will reduce the probability of separations, and second, it will provide conditions to spend more time with together. In the following, I will elucidate my rationale by advancing these two reasons.
First of all, sharing various similar interests and hobbies will make it difficult to encounter separation, which causes us to not be together because in life there will be different unprecedented conditions that make people decide differently and separate their ways. However, it will be once in a blue moon for people to run into these decisions, which cause them to lose their friendship. My own example is a compelling evidence of this reality. When I was in high school, I had a close friend, we did not have similar hobbies, but the school assignments made us to stick together. However, after high school, we were no longer friends because each of us made our specific decisions, he wanted to work, but I decided to study at university. Had we had similar interests, we would have been friends still.
Moreover, having same interests gives us opportunities to spend time together and do not lose a friendship. Clearly, people with same interests will have more chances to continue their friendship because they can do many activities together. For example, people who like same sports will have a chance to meet their friends in order to do the sport. For individuals, who share similar interests, it would be a piece of cake to spend time and hang out with together. For instance, a recent study undertaken by the University of London demonstrated that happening long lasting-friendship with people with same interests is fifty percent more probable.
In brief, all aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that in order to have a long-lasting relationship, it is better to have similar interests and hobbies. This is because it will decrease separations, and it will give people more chance to spend time with each other.
- Which do you prefer to buy new technological devices immediately after they become available or to wait till many people have adopted accepted and started to use them 60
- Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before Give specific examples and details to support your answer 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For any business to be successful it must spend a lot of money on advertising 73
- When you give money to charitable organizations do you prefer to choose how the donation will be used for example donate money on food or service or advertisement for organizations or leave the decision to the organizations 76
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Friends play an extremely significant ro...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ale by advancing these two reasons. First of all, sharing various similar in...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., we would have been friends still. Moreover, having same interests gives us...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... spend time and hang out with together. For instance, a recent study undertaken by ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sts is fifty percent more probable. In brief, all aforementioned reasons lea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, for example, for instance, in brief, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0880195599 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93733101825 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493887530562 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0642246799 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.526315789 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144229499105 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507548100999 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495479659801 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963913182344 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464153744874 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Friends play an extremely significant ro...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ale by advancing these two reasons. First of all, sharing various similar in...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., we would have been friends still. Moreover, having same interests gives us...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 474, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... spend time and hang out with together. For instance, a recent study undertaken by ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sts is fifty percent more probable. In brief, all aforementioned reasons lea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, for example, for instance, in brief, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0880195599 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93733101825 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493887530562 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0642246799 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.526315789 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144229499105 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507548100999 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495479659801 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963913182344 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464153744874 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.