The bar chart shows the percentage of adults who were overweight or obese (too fat or much too fat) in one country from 1965 to 2015. The pie chart shows the proportion of adults who were overweight, obese or severely obese in 2015.
Sum�arise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
In the two charts below, we can see that the bar chart presents the ratio of adults who were overweight or too fat in a country from 1965 to 2015. And the other chart gives the percentage by health level increments, from the Healthy to the Severely Obese.
it can be seen that the number of overweight or obese adults from 1965 to 1985 remained constant, but it started to increase in 1995 and the following years. In general, almost the adult population in 2015 were too fat, which accounts for a highest percentage.
With regard the bar chart, in 30 decades the percentage of adults who were overweight or obese were similar, under 50 percent. Then, the adults were fatter and the ratio went up suddenly to 60 percent in 1995. It continued to rise in the early 21 century, which reached a peak of approximately 75 percent.
It can be seen from the pie chart, the Obese was shown by yellow, which largest and was over a third of population in 2015. The amount of Overweight was 31 percent and just lower than the Obese 3 percent. The only good thing was the Healthy or underweight was over a quarter and the Dangerously fat was just 6 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ealth level increments, from the Healthy to the Severely Obese. it can be seen...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... the Healthy to the Severely Obese. it can be seen that the number of overweig...
^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the number of overweight or obese adults from 1965 to 1985 remained constant, but...
^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ral, almost the adult population in 2015 were too fat, which accounts for a highe...
^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... 2015 were too fat, which accounts for a highest percentage. With regard the...
^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...5. It continued to rise in the early 21 century, which reached a peak of approximately ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... amount of Overweight was 31 percent and just lower than the Obese 3 percent. The...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, then, third, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.48453608247 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 5.05154639175 218% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 937.175257732 101% => OK
No of words: 210.0 206.0 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50476190476 4.54256449028 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47048793917 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 127.690721649 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519047619048 0.622605031667 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 290.88556701 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 24.0923224285 44.8134815571 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.6 76.5299724578 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 16.8248392259 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 4.34317383033 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 2.54639175258 275% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439878068434 0.216113520407 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171221037159 0.0766984524023 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135860790097 0.0603063233224 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27534071834 0.12726935374 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102498955675 0.0580467560999 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 8.37731958763 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 70.7449484536 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 7.45979381443 106% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 8.71597938144 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 7.59969072165 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 41.2886597938 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.