The shown pie chart compares the ratios of energy used for different purposes, while the data table illustrates how much electricity is used per household according to the number of members in an exemplary Australian family.
At the first glance, it is clear that most energy is used for balancing the atmosphere and boiling water, while stand-by power and cooking are less used in the survey. Additionally, the amount of electricity used increases as the total individuals in a house rise.
Regarding the pie chart, the biggest energy comes to heating and cooling purposes, ranks first in the list with 38%, relatively higher than that of water heating with 25%. Meanwhile, the information of appliances such as clothes and dish washers, entertainment, and so on occupies moderately 16%. Simultaneously, the figure for both progres, freezers and lighting were identical, which makes up 7%. However, cooking and stand-by power bottom the chart with merely 4% and 3%, consecutively.
Turning into the data table, the household with only one person consumes the range from 5.000 to 6.500 kilowatt hours every year. Besides, if the number of people comes to two and three, the electricity used is 6.000 - 8.000 kWh and 7.500 - 10.000 kWh, respectively. Moreover, 12.000 - 16.000 kWh is recorded in the figure for families with six or more members.
- The graph below gives information about how people in the United Kingdom spend their income Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- The pie chart below shows where energy is used in a typical Australian household and the table shows the amount of eletricity used according to the number of occupants Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 89
- The bar graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from five countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavant 73
- The monthly price of exported rice from Thailand and Vietnam from 2012 to 2015 Million dollars per tons 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1135.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20642201835 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79531089988 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646788990826 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9262751787 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19464761368 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700221009673 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710787172861 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130009112113 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827505203455 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.