The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005.
The two pie charts reveal changes in a European country’s energy generation from five different sources namely coal, gas, petro, nuclear and others during a 10-year-period from 1995 to 2005. Overall, the rate of energy produced from all categories except for Petro witnessed an upward trend over these years surveyed. Additionally, Coal was used the most type of energy among all.
It can be seen that the figure for coal always possessed the highest value, accounting for 29.80% in the first year then made up 30.93% in the last year. This was followed by gas with its proportion increased by 0.68% to 30.31% 10 years afterwards. Regarding the energy generated from nuclear and other kinds of material, the rate maintained the lowest figure despite an approximate two-fold growth, comprised of 6.4% and 4.9% in 1995 then rose to 10.1% and 9.1% in 2005 respectively. By contrast, only a decline occurred in the proportion of energy produced from petro in two years shown, which its figure dropped by 9.72% to 19.55% in the last year.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
- The chart shows the main methods of transportation for people traveling to a university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant 84
- The chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The pie charts show a comparison of kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('approximately') instead an adjective, or a noun ('two-fold') instead of another adjective.
...te maintained the lowest figure despite an approximately two-fold growth, comprised of 6.4% and 4.9% in 1...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, then, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98275862069 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64653144376 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649425287356 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.768156993 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.857142857 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152806822893 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709001001659 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0822399663368 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131906453856 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605569883597 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.