50. The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. Indisputably, negative actions could have some experience that is worthy for us to learn. Nevertheless, negative actions could demonstrate a bad behavior for students to imitate. Personally, I think we should examine the example that we presented to our student, if there’s anything that is worthy for students to know, even though it’s bad, we should teach them. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that we should teach all the negative actions because it has some experience inside it, and would argue that negative actions could demonstrate a bad behavior for student to imitate.
First of all, praising positive actions and ignore negative ones could construct the right personality. Exposure under the positive actions would make student tend to imitate, result in forming the right personality. To illustrate, let us took at the example of the well know George Washington. He cut down the cherry tree on his back yard, and didn’t afraid of being scolded by his father, will to admit his guilt. After hearing this story, when I make a mistake, I will be willing to admit my mistake and take the responsibility of consequences. In the circumstance, the right personality has been established in my mindset. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that teaching the positive actions had benefit on forming the right personality.
But it’s also worth considering that only praising the positive action is not enough. Specifically, the negative one also brought some experience. A good case would be Albert Einstein, although he is well famous in Physics, and quite success, but he wasn’t faithful to his marriage, and result in staying single until he’s dead. Both common sense and personal experience have told us that we shouldn’t only look at others success, but should consider the example thoroughly, and gaining experience from the example. Hence, all the evidence demonstrates that we should consider what we teach to our students, even if the actions are bad, but if there’s meaning inside it, we should also praise.
In conclusion, although negative ones could have some specific meaning that we should never ignore, but the positive one must also being applaud. As long as some measurements are performed, or some area involved, we should consider the meaning behind the action. In fact, not only praise positive one and ignore negative one, but considering comprehensively, if the motivation behind the negative action is good, then we should also praise.
- Milk and dairy products are rich in vitamin D and calcium substances essential for building and maintaining bones Many people therefore say that a diet rich in dairy products can help prevent osteoporosis a disease that is linked to both environmental and 58
- 89 All parents should be required to volunteer time to their children s schools 50
- 50 The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 54
- Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate Another advantage is that housing costs in Clearview have fallen significantly during the past year and taxes remain l 62
- Milk and dairy products are rich in vitamin D and calcium substances essential for building and maintaining bones Many people therefore say that a diet rich in dairy products can help prevent osteoporosis a disease that is linked to both environmental and 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 651, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...en if the actions are bad, but if there’s meaning inside it, we should also praise. In...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, look, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, i think, in conclusion, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2209.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81905749439 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48463356974 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 12.0 1.77640449438 676% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3040837011 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.45 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34399912268 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12640794875 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138523172687 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218422550918 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673022441511 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.